English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It sounds great to tell people we can run from Iraq without consequences. That's an easy sell.

But how will dems sell hard-core socialism that is antiquated and uncompetitive in a globalized world?

2007-03-26 14:59:02 · 11 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

By disguising it under an assumed name or policy and calling it "humanism" or secularism".If the American public knew the real implications of basic Socialism they would recoil at the very thought. So the basic tenents are simply 'reworked' and sold to the public under a more "palatable" platform! Many European nations have now become quaisi-Socialistic....France is a good example! Recently a bill was banned by Cherac that would have allowed employers to fire new workers who did not meet the work force potential...in other words, an employer has to keep that person on the payroll even if he/she doesn't show up for work!!!! Imagine that happening in the USA? But...that's Socialism..the Government provides everything for everyone,regarless of how hard they do or don't work...no favoritism here!Under Socialism, they (Government) can take your property or assets and distribute them to the less fortunate whether they worked for it or not! Everything is "relative", there is no right or wrong, there is no God (just the Government)and there are no moral judgements made on personal behavior but there is no personal responsibility either...Big Brother Provides!!!

2007-03-26 15:26:19 · answer #1 · answered by foxfire 3 · 1 1

we've been living in a especially a lot socialist society because of the fact the Fed replaced into began and the hot Deal's offspring sprung. The question is while will the easy voters be prepared to vote in leaders that are able to downsizing our government? while can we understand that the two events have placed their own pastimes previously the freedoms of their individuals. If the Republicans have been in instead of Obama, they could be nevertheless helping corporation by way of giving them funds. Is it any much less socialist once you may do away with the bread and circuses each and every time the companies end obeying the king's adult adult males?

2016-10-20 00:26:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Cookie the democrats aren't saying run from Iraq; the nation we shouldn't be in to begin with. They are saying a new plan is needed. And we do need a new plan the Bush Administration couldn't find its way-out of a wet paper bag, let alone a botched up war.
The democrats only want to provide health care for the uninsured Americans. But I guess you think they are so evil for wanting to help people. Huh? Cookie!

2007-03-27 06:19:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

they will lie and sidestep the issues with a "bush lied" mantra and "Iraq War"

Then the American people, who on a whole are not even close to believing in a socialized agenda (well save those lazy good for nothing Liberals), will vote them in because they have a short attention span and would rather watch whatever celebrity bimbo has her underwear off.

2007-03-26 15:05:27 · answer #4 · answered by jirwin7211 2 · 0 1

Same as always, false advertising. If you tried their techniques anywhere other than politics, you would be in jail.

2007-03-26 15:55:13 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 1

very nice point and thats why i think they lose in the last steps of the election

2007-03-26 15:01:50 · answer #6 · answered by legendre_22 2 · 3 1

probably won't. You can't make a country socialist overnight.

2007-03-26 15:04:16 · answer #7 · answered by Gary W 4 · 0 1

Liberal broadcast media

2007-03-26 15:02:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

force

2007-03-26 15:05:18 · answer #9 · answered by mark k 3 · 0 1

we dont have to the republicans are shooting themselves in the foot so much that they are doing it for us

2007-03-26 15:02:32 · answer #10 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers