If you had 1 dime and both Clinton and Obama needed it to cross the bridge toll, who would you give it to?

Answer 1

Obama.
Hillary is Satan.

Answer 2

The one who could answer this question: "If you had one dime, and both Clinton and Obama needed it to cross the bridge toll, who would you give it to?" Yeah, the one to answer the question most honestly. Answer would be something like this: "I would give it to my esteemed colleague for I am unselfish and generous, and then I would be owed a favor by them. Yes, my 10 cent investment in the future is assured."

Answer 3

Obama

Answer 4

In a suited worldwide, tolls on roads and bridges might artwork in case you should place the funds gathered right into a fund set aside purely for the use in repairing roads and bridges. The restoration of roads and bridges might then be funded via people who use them the main and help to ease taxes. The Massachusetts Turnpike is an occasion of a stable thank you to apply tolls. You p.c.. up a cost tag once you get onto the line then counting on the place you get off you pay the toll. however the question is ought to a fund be set up so foolproof to circumvent our government from taking from it to pay for their puppy projects, to return favors to lobbyists and specific interest communities. (Democrats and Republicans are the two in command of that for those of you who continually make it a social gathering issure!) i do no longer think of that is achieveable in spite of if, finally somebody might detect a loophole or undertaking the constitutionality of the the excellent option to maintain the fund intact . seem on the argument over the 2nd replace of the form and the the excellent option to undergo hands in Washington DC. seem what the government has completed to break our Social protection device. i don't recognize what the respond is, yet something desires to be completed. no longer sufficient user-friendly people interior the government. the actuality that our government has become to special and to cumbersome would not help. And purely for those of you who will prefer to bounce throughout me, i'm an self sufficient and DONOT persist with any social gathering lines. i think of for myself!!! Addendum (15hrs later): one element that I even have been thinking approximately is why no longer bypass lower back to utilising extra railroads for the two merchandise transportation and holiday. this might take a great style of injury and tear off our highways. they may be owned and maintained via private agencies and take the tension off the government. the only situation with it is that a huge style of the rails have been dismantled, yet they may be rebuilt. There may be much less heavy motor vehicle site visitors on our highways and much less injuries. Trains ought to be superior that don't use fossil fuels so there may be much less pollutants too. Our roads may be extra secure and not prefer plenty restoration, our environment may be cleanser and it would create stable paying jobs. people interior the government would not be able to apply the capital for their very own very own projects. the fee for utilising the railroad may be funded via people who paid to apply it.

Answer 5

Obama 'cause he's the future and Clinton's the past. Always go forward not looking behind for guidance.

Answer 6

Clinton.

Answer 7

Either one - all tolls are so much more than a dime they still could not cross.

Answer 8

Obama. I'd even laugh at Clinton for asking me!!

Answer 9

Obama because then Her Majesty would tax him for it and they'd end up splitting it between them because with both of them being half-aXXed, they could cross as one whole person.

Answer 10

I'd keep the dime, kick them both in the water, and use that dime and 15 more cents to call Al Gore and beg him to run for President

Answer 11

Since Clinton just got $10 Million from Dubai, I'd throw it in the water.