besides ruining the country,going to war,inflation up the ying yang, making texas the gate way to illegal immigration and being the most annoying state in the union.can we make it a law that no texan can EVER bcome president of the united states again?
2007-03-26 14:23:51 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
there is no best answer here.you all are a bunch of losers.
2007-03-29 10:34:35 · update #1
No, that would be HIGHLY ILLEGAL, we cant deny ANY AMERICAN BORN (born in US) citizen from running for president (they must be at least 35 too)
2007-03-26 14:29:30 · answer #1 · answered by True American 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
usa shape dictates that a president could in basic terms serve 2 4-year words in place of work. on the grounds that it is the top of George Bush's 2d term, he can not ever run for president lower back in his lifetime (except Congress passes an modification to the Constitiution to legalize this).
2016-10-20 00:22:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that would be unconstitutional as any natural born citizen 35 years or older is eligible to run for President.
Your logic is very flawed. It's like you're saying all Texans are like GWB.
2007-03-26 14:33:09 · answer #3 · answered by susandiane311 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Individual freedom is the dream of our age. It's what our leaders promise to give us, it defines how we think of ourselves and, repeatedly, we have gone to war to impose freedom around the world. But if you step back and look at what freedom actually means for us today, it's a strange and limited kind of freedom.
Politicians promised to liberate us from the old dead hand of bureaucracy, but they have created an evermore controlling system of social management, driven by targets and numbers. Governments committed to freedom of choice have presided over a rise in inequality and a dramatic collapse in social mobility. And abroad, in Iraq and Afghanistan, the attempt to enforce freedom has led to bloody mayhem and the rise of an authoritarian anti-democratic Islamism. This, in turn, has helped inspire terrorist attacks in Britain. In response, the Government has dismantled long-standing laws designed to protect our freedom.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/noise/?id=trap
2007-03-27 02:01:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, because denying a person from a state of proabably about 700,000 the right to be president because of 1 of those people..... you sir have made one of the dumbest generalizations i have ever heard. Idiot
2007-03-26 14:33:45 · answer #5 · answered by Kyle 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
well johnson was an okay texan.
but ify ou wanna kick us out of office we can just become our own country again and america will lose a vast amount of it's army. :)
2007-03-26 14:50:33 · answer #6 · answered by Franny Von Doom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd take Texas over California any day.
2007-03-26 14:43:19 · answer #7 · answered by This Is Me Being Grumpy 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
That's an unfair generalization.
2007-03-26 14:31:30 · answer #8 · answered by Jacqueline M 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
bush may be born in texas, and have a ranch in texas, but he was not raised in texas. next time vote hippie.
--------------------------------
edit: by the way ron paul is a texan... a real texan, and he definately has my vote.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/
2007-03-26 14:56:42 · answer #9 · answered by absolutroot 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Funny question, if we do, I say we also ban Mass., NY, Ill, and CA. Oh, and Arkansas!!!! Okay?
2007-03-26 14:45:40 · answer #10 · answered by rosi l 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋