Are these the actions of a Patriot?

Question

1.Spread the national army too thin.
2.Exposed a Under cover national security agent
3.Created a law to legally detain and hold citizens without due process of the law (aka the Patriot Act)
4.Used Federal law inforcement to abuse the newly passed Patriot act
5.Created the nations energy policy with oil companies owned by US and Foreign Nations
6.Left our borders and ports under funded and with little guard after 9/11

I just ask all to anwser Yes or No. Before you add any additional comments.

I'm not a liberal dick richard. I'm a registered Independent that so happens to read what's going on. I suggest you do the same.

Answer 1

No.
These are the actions of irresponsible, incompetent fools.

And THEY have the nerve to say we're either with them or against them?

The WORST administration in US history!

Answer 2

A Patriot doesn't make up stuff like you are
1.Spread the national army too thin.
Who are the ones put into the funding our troops money for peanuts and other pork project.
2.Exposed a Under cover national security agent
Not proven and no one has been charge if a security agent is such a problem let me ask you how about exposing secret operations and putting agents in the field at risk like the NY Times. Valeria was not an "invisible".
3.Created a law to legally detain and hold citizens without due process of the law (aka the Patriot Act)
The Patriot Act is the same set of laws use to take down organize crime in this country was tested with ACLU when abuses were found they were exposed and people punished.
4.Used Federal law inforcement to abuse the newly passed Patriot act
I will refer you back to #3.
5.Created the nations energy policy with oil companies owned by US and Foreign Nations
You need to show some proof of that one.
6.Left our borders and ports under funded and with little guard after 9/11
When enforcing the borders what group crys racism and wants to have open boarders.

To sum it up all your charges are false. Therefore isn't an act of anyone right now.

Answer 3

No to each (as I interpret your meaning -- I'm pretty sure you meant, in 3, 'illegally").

Your biggest flaw is that the list is woefully incomplete.

LOL, I love it, an answer brings up the bill the House just passed -- 'cause the last 4 years never happened, I suppose.

Not only is your list too short, but 'unpatriotic' or even 'anti-American' don't go nearly far enough.

I maintain he isn't entirely human.

Answer 4

So, now you're passing judgement upon all performers; based upon regardless of if or not they help the Bush administration? His words advise that he's discern out his freedom of speech. to procure a situation with that? besides the shown fact that...a remark with reference to the 1st replace is so as. you have the "freedom" to assert regardless of you like in this united states, and a number of different of the time there are not any repercussions. each and every so often - as in relation to Michael Richards or Don Imus, or maybe the Dixie Chicks - there are. once you're in the conventional public eye, once you're a movie star, you have extra get entry to to mass media than the accepted individual. As a movie star, it is your selection as an American citizen in case you want to wax political or not. that's a unfastened industry and that's a danger celebrities elect to take. **************************************... yet hear to me...you would be unable to have it the two techniques. in case you advise that Don Imus' firing grew to become right into a case of laptop, then you definately have not have been given any justification for suggesting that Rage against the gadget are "traitors." **************************************... And right this is yet another opinion with regards to your postings. whilst some friends of ours returned from a visit to Amsterdam (a retired semi driving force - not some hippy musican), they informed us,"you would be able to desire to absolutely tell the distinctive vacationer pupils from the interior sight pupils in the sidewalk cafe's." "How," I asked? "Oh, they have been those utilising the "F" observe excessively." And what i'm telling YOU is that in case you do someting to extra, it loses its impact. this is like putting too lots salt in the soup. So why do not you ease up on the "traitor" rhetoric slightly and improve the style of your postings? you will workout your freedom of speech; purely at a extra mature point.

Answer 5

No.
But then I knew all along from his biography, and do not understand why others did not recognize, that Bush was nothing more than a self serving, over privileged, under talented, barely functional, egomaniac before they voted for him and let our country drift further into mediocrity and become mired in his administrations ineptness and lack of candor and honesty.

Answer 6

Yes.

Answer 7

Our Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves at the shame of it...of course they aren't!

Answer 8

yes

Answer 9

No to all 6 questions. Who do you have in mind?

Answer 10

Loaded and biased propaganda question created by none other than a liberal.