2007-03-26 13:20:22 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
H E L L Yes!
A dead yellow dog would be better than the Chimp in Charge!
She did a good job the first 8 years that she ran it for us!
'93/01
During Clinton's presidency, the world continued to transition from the political order of the Cold War, and the United States experienced the longest period of peace-time economic expansion in its history.
It CAN happen again!
2007-03-26 13:34:47 · answer #1 · answered by sniffels323 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It all depends what the person wants in a president. Some people want a president that improves the economy and streangthens friendships with other nations like Iran and N. Korea. Some people want a president for a specific reason, like they are for gay rights or they are against abortion. And the very nimble minded people vote for a specific canidate just because of their looks. My opinion is we need a president that is good all around. A president that isnt afraid to agree with other parties. If democrats and republicans pooled their ideas, they would produce a partial perfect president. We need a president that isnt going to ignore people just because of their political stance. The main problem with politicians is that they never can find a common ground and their always arguing and bickering between themselved. The simple solution is simply just to listen to each other. Thats all. And Frankly i do not think Hillary Clinton will listen very well. She may be a great supporter of one of your beleifs, but dont be selfish. Vote for someone that is going to help everyone in the country repubs and demos alike. That person may be Republican, that person may be Democrat, or even an Independant pary. Before you make judgement on a candiate, look deeper than their party status. Try to decifer what they really want.
2007-03-26 20:33:02 · answer #2 · answered by Joe M 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe Hillary would be a good choice as I feel she is easily changes her stands as to what is important to get the votes. I've notice her react in a very disturbing way when she feels the cameras are not on her, seen her change her point of view right in a middle of a statement when she feels her opinion won't be a popular one... Basically I feel she is strickily a politician who's only goal is getting in the White House.. I live in the State of NY and she has done absolutely nothing for us that simply isn't politically correct. Personal feelings She's PHONY!!! And NO I'm not a conservative trying to down her capabilities, I simply don't like what she stands for. I do like Edwards though although I don't feel he has much of a chance.
2007-03-26 20:38:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. The nation needs to break as cleanly as possible from the neocon deathtrap mentality, the inbred hillbilly illegitimate son of Reagan mentality that mars the American body politic. The hypocritical posture that says Democrats are the party of tax and spend, when all evidence points to the contrary being true, and which still worships trickle down as the economic gold standard, even after his daddy pegged it correctly as "voodoo economics" in 1980. The party that has destroyed the US treasury and surplus with a fraudulent war based on manufactured false intelligence. The party that spends trillions in Iraq, and blithely hands out tax breaks to any millionaire with a U.S. address.
Take back the country, and banish the neocon cavemen back to their caves where they belong.
2007-03-26 20:27:47 · answer #4 · answered by Winston Smith 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Actually, I like Hillary and I think she'd do a good job as President. Of course, a hamster would do better than Bush. But you know before she could be sworn in every neo-con in the country would be going through every pair of underwear she ever owned looking for dirt (or something).
2007-03-26 20:40:04 · answer #5 · answered by socrates 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
In no way would this nation be better off having a socialist in command. On the foriegn relations front, right now our concerns are on the middle east, and like it or not, we all know how they feel about woman and their place in the world.
She is running on the typical platform of everyone is doing it wrong, yet I have no better solution. I cant think of a single piece of legislation that she introduced that hsa been beeficial to our coountry as a whole.
2007-03-26 20:28:00 · answer #6 · answered by Papa Joe 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hillary would be an improvement, yes.
Doesn't say much for Bush.
2007-03-26 21:18:41 · answer #7 · answered by Gerry S 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hilary has absolutely no personality. She would make a horrible spokesperson for the USA. Her only claim to fame is the failed grab at her husbands beginning term at changing health care. And That her husband cared not a whit for her at all and she put up with it. She is a victim and an enabler. Not good.
2007-03-26 20:26:45 · answer #8 · answered by swamp elf 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, I think we would go back to the way it was in the 1990's.
2007-03-27 21:42:54 · answer #9 · answered by G.W. loves winter! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From day one. The world would take the day off to celebrate our intelligent choice for President.
2007-03-26 22:15:04 · answer #10 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋