some movies are to childish to be PG-13 but others are to (violent, graphic, sexual content, scary) to be PG. Like Monster House(too scary for my 8 yr old sis, not so much to be PG13)or a walk to remember(to much profanity for lil ones). Tell me what you think.
2007-03-26 13:18:03 · 7 answers · asked by ChickAroo 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I dont mean TV, theres already tons of stuff for that. Im coming from a huge family, so mabey this is just me... but I really think so! Mabey if enough people agree, I can send this in to the people who give movies their ratings...
2007-03-26 13:26:42 · update #1
I think PG13 needs to be looked at. Alot of that needs to be rated NC17 or R. Too much sexual content and bad language in many of those movies
2007-03-26 13:26:01 · answer #1 · answered by charkeyp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well with the rating they give you the reasons like crude humor or violence
so i really don't think there is a necessity for a rating between pg and pg-13
but if people complain that there should be, then there should
2007-03-26 13:31:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I totally agree.
2007-03-26 13:24:59 · answer #3 · answered by Kaley 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yeah i think so too.
because in the "Chronicles of Narnia", its rated PG 13 since there's only violence in it, nothing more.
2007-03-26 13:23:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
theres already a Y7 on TV
2007-03-26 13:22:03 · answer #5 · answered by Casey 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no, i dont think any more ratings would make a difference, they already are going overboard!
2007-03-26 13:22:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
yah i totally agree!
2007-03-26 13:22:07 · answer #7 · answered by Linzi 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋