911 and iraq war project..?

Question

i have a projet due about the iraq war and about 911 wats a good way of like presenting it.. i dotn just want a board and definetly not a powerpoint i want something that can wow people but i dotn want anythign that liek evry1 has any ideas?

Answer 1

You could start by addressing the class and claiming, "9/11 was and inside job, so what are we doing in Iraq?" People will say stuff like, "Oh yea, so prove it".

You could then pull up some Internet web sites and show them the "smoking gun". You could show this to be true by pointing out a lot of circumstantial evidence and then finishing with concrete evidence. Few people know that the jet engine(s) found at the Pentagon crash site have been Identified as Pratt & Whitney JT8D's: This engine is too small to be used on a Boeing 757, but just right for a smaller military aircraft.

Then you could repeat the question, "so who did it and why?"

Wait a second, and ask, "Who benefits?"

Ask, "Do the Oil Companies stand to gain anything?" Answer, "you bet they do."

Ask, " Do Military Contractors stand to gain anything?" Answer, "you bet they do."

Ask, "Did Exxon contribute huge sums of money to get G.W. Bush elected Pres.?" Answer, "you bet they did."

Ask, "Did Halliburton and Raytheon Co. contribute huge sums of money to get G.W. Bush elected Pres.?" Answer, "you bet they did."

Ask, " Does Pres. G.W. Bush and V.P. Dick Cheney have large interest in these industries ?" Answer, " you bet they do."

You don't have to prove that these NeoCons are responsible, it is understood that we need a new investigation of 9/11.

Again you could repeat the question, "So I ask you, What is the U.S. doing in Iraq, if 9/11 was an inside job?"

The following are some web sites that show there is something very wrong with the "Official 9/11 Commissions Report. Good Luck !

______________________________________

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg (removed)

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here are some video clip showing a trail of explosive squibs just before the destruction wave.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1798029680029341757
http://www.yourdailymedia.com/media/1152446814/911_WTC_Squibs

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), started planning the invasion of Iraq, even before Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

__________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl= (removed)

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 2

I think you should define your position on 9/11 and the Iraq war. This would then allow for a broader response. Do you feel the two are related? If so, how? If not, why not?

Do you believe the two share some common linkage, but believe the war in Iraq was perhaps an over reaction on the governments part?

How you feel on the subject is of most importance. If you want idea's, then please be a little more specific.

Answer 3

Nightingale, no longer a single WMD recent in Iraq? what's your foundation for this? Brainwashing by utilising the media? perchance you need to examine the Duelfer record on the hunt for WMDs. in spite of finding in ordinary terms a small share of the weapons web pages contained in the rustic, the inspectors stumbled on numerous chemical weapons. those are the comparable weapons that have been meant to have been destroyed decrease back contained in the Nineties and that we've been advised did no longer exist anymore. besides, evidence of a finished poisons and pollution application that became by no ability disclosed to the UN inspectors became stumbled on. the comparable for al Qaeda. The senate intelligence committe record stumbled on and precise multiple contacts between al Qaeda and Iraq. yet we a constantly advised by utilising liberals that there became no touch between the two. i assume they by no ability enable the information get contained in the way of a sturdy lie.