English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Lets say for a moment that the ends justifies the means in creating an empire look past the holochaust stuff towards the other stuff, whats your opinion on hitler and his method of gaining power and dominionation ( if your going post that "your phsyco" or "evil" crap post it somewhere else)

2007-03-26 13:04:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

From a military standpoint Hitler was a genius in the start of the WWII. Later on in the war he was addicted to several drugs and made some very stupid mistakes. If not for his drug addiction, he could had a very good chance of ruling Europe. I mean he made Germany a major military power from the ashes of WWI. Another problem was his strict control of his military personal. The Normandy invasion could have turned out the other way if Hitler had not put the Panzer division under soley under his control. On June 6, 1944 when the invasion began his advisors were afraid to wake him, so tanks could not be deployed.

2007-03-26 13:24:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He did do a good job under the development of buildings and he did gain a sizeable empire. He did alot of great things. However i dont think that the amount of great acheivements he accomplished can forgive all the killing he did. Then he ends up having all the he acheived destroyed in the end so the deaths mean nothing but heart break in the end which i think is the saddest story of all. Even if he did help bring about the Jet engine, even if he did find out the ejection seat and even if he found out a bit on lung cancer. He did have a intresting ration setup regarding ciggaretes. for smokers getting their smokes and the ones that did not smoke got chocolate or something like that.
Had hitler not killed as he did i think he would have been a great leader. As for his seizing of power it was amazing. He did a huge coup on the govement that led to there downfall. As for his oratory was phenomanal he was able to leave a crowd spell bound by his very words and have you ever seen those eyes? As for his invasions i think were impressive especially for how far he got but i think if he would have been smart he would have seen to it that britain really did fall. instead she recovered and after his disastrous invasion of russia just could not stomach the brits and the americans. He failed to learn from history of the russian winter and i think it costed him the war. Had he considered just how POWERFUL the winter REALLY was he may have had more success.
Despite all this i regard the man as evil. I think no one should ever do as he had done ever again. I think the extermination of many people whetever they be jewish, gay, black, or gypsies is wrong. He also killed alot of Intellectuals which makes sense but i think led to some instablitity in the country, smart people do great things. Smart people sometimes bring down tyranny as well.

2007-03-26 15:10:04 · answer #2 · answered by Proud Michigander 3 · 0 0

after ww1 Germany was in ruins,Hitler had a vision ,he offered a insight to a better Germany.in the early dayshe was like a god to the German people.many good years where spent building a strong national socialist government.the architecture of Berlin was outstanding.war economy built up Germany,they had the best battleships of the time,they had the best guns ammo ,they had the best airplanes,true America had p-51 mustangs and Britt's had spitfires,all powered by the rolls Merlin engine,but the me-109 was a great plane.and Germany had jets too,as well as missiles.Hitlers rise to power is a tribute to the socialist system .INSANITY finished the dream off,the details are in the history books....siege hail,long live the fuhrer.cheers

2007-03-26 13:29:30 · answer #3 · answered by bushco43 1 · 1 0

I'm going to get some flak for this but in many ways old Adolf was a brilliant man.

Reduced hyper inflation to 2 figures in a relatively short time. Built a road infrastructure which is still the envy of the world. Reduced unemployment dramatically.

Of course everyone would have to learn to speak German....and its NOT a fun language to learn.

His military exploits were near genius. Lets face it, he raised a world class army out of a broken country and went on to walk over the rest of Europe. His ambitions broke him in the end of course.

2007-03-26 13:14:10 · answer #4 · answered by philip_jones2003 5 · 1 1

there is not any easily hell or heaven. i've got confidence like i've got fallen down the rabbit hollow here. Hitler replaced into defective, in basic terms like a lemon of a vehicle or a working laptop or pc with a foul motherboard. He did not have the spectacular areas. in case you % to take the technology out of the convo, then Hitler replaced into evil for particular. he's the place anybody else is going while they die. Heaven and hell are here on earth.

2016-10-20 00:14:33 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Just like Clinton who basically owns CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, and C-Span and who also has a dirty claw in FOX. Specifically CNN, CBS and C-Span the Clintons have a very good friend who runs those news agencies but I forgot the name. If there is anyone who really wants to know I could look his name up for you (like those sad libs out there.)

For Hitler there was a government-media complex like there is with Clinton. He was able to stifle the views of the opposition in the news. I call it clintonianism. Once in power he used racism to his advantage and killed everyone who opposed him.

2007-03-26 13:18:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

How do you manage to look past 6 million tortured and systematically murdered Jews and 6 million non Jews of various distinction also murdered? It is not possible unless you are a psycho, the correct spelling. Evil is not always applicable. I don't see how anyone can look past his craziness in not just how he went after the Jews, but anyone who may have disagreed with him or anyone he even suspected as threatening. He was not a genius as so many crazy people are; he was just crazy--and very likely, evil.

2007-03-26 13:19:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He was able to look into the future, a lot of his ideas, were
visionary. He had some great ideas, the way they were,
implemented, left a lot to be desired. However if he were
alive today, he could have done the same things and with
the help of today,s Liberal Media. That being said,the
foundation of any empire, has to have a solid base to endure.

2007-03-26 13:17:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Adolf Hitler....his methods were cruel and sadistic.
His rise to power was a mirror of this behavior with the Jews being his scapegoat to gain that power.

=============================

2007-03-26 13:10:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

To add to anthony i -- he also used a rubber stamp legislature, party loyalist prosecting attorneys and compliant judges -- does that sound familiar? Oh yeah, and a docile citizenry hopped up on "Patriotism" and love of the Fatherland.

2007-03-26 13:21:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers