Why do you think that both the Fema and NIST reports 9/11 cannot explain the collapse of WTC 7?

Question

The official FEMA reports say that they do not currently have an explaination for the collapse of WTC 7, but the report said that the collapse not likely caused by fire.

That the NIST reported that officials were not rehired to complete the investigation, so they currently cannot explain the collapse.

Why do you think they cannot explain part of the original conspiracy theory of the worst attact in American history?

But why do both of the OFFICIAL reports just leave out WTC 7, and why can't they explain it?

Answer 1

Hello, Pizza Hut? Yes, I'd like to order the "Conspiracy Lover's Pizza"....

You know....It's got a dense crust....whole cherries...old cheese...sour grapes and absolutely NO MEAT....

How much is that?....$9.11...really?...Now THAT's a coincidence!

Answer 2

NIST initially reported fires for WTC7, but later released more details on structural damages. There's lot of investigation consulting with structure engineers/experts. More report is expected in 2007.

It's coming. Just hold your horses.

You do have to go beyond what conspiracy folks tell you. They'll dismiss facts as 'propaganda' or 'cover up lies' and not tell you.

It's not easy figuring out how a big building fails when all you have is just concrete crums and metal pieces. Have a little patience.

It's like conjecturing you're dinner mysteriously disappeared when your mom is making dinner right now. And it'll be ready in few minutes.

There are lot of information out there. Just because someone or some 'web sites' tell you it doesn't exists doesn't mean they're right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center

Answer 3

It is true that there is no confirmed explanation for the collapse of building 7. In fact, they barely even speculated. FEMA just dropped the ball on the investigation of that building possibly because it was not directly hit by the hijacked planes and so just deemed to not actually be part of the investigation of the terrorist attack. I suppose they just thought it would be considered another oddity of the day.

I believe their exclusion of a thorough investigation of this was due to their "lack of imagination" as to other major events leading up to this attack that have been totally dismissed without investigation. When considering the resulting changes in governing our country, and the ramifications of those changes, I would say that was a huge mistake whether you believe it was an inside job or whether we are just left with the unknown factor that we may be seriously underestimating our enemy. Huge mistake.

Answer 4

Yes, these reports are essentially full on what you could call anti-science. They start with a conclusion and attempt to prove it. Well they did not come close and still refuse to look at the most obvious hypothesis of conrolled demolition. We need a new investigation into 9/11. In my mind the truth about 9/11 is the only thing that will stop the war and all of the other problems that have occured since.

Answer 5

Well, I can tell not too many people have common sense nor did they take high school physics. First of all, there is video of the air planes hitting the WTC. Even with that evidence, there is a group, who think it was an inside job, that the Government " blew up" the buildings.

The main towers were build with steel and concrete. Steel, according to welders and most information I have read, melts at between 1500 degrees and 2000 degrees. Aviation fuel from the jet liners, with the material inside the building, burned at approx 2800 degrees, hot enough to liquefy the concrete.

The steel was already soft and melting, the concrete failing, and all those "tons" of undamaged building above the point of impact. GRAVITY caused the cascade or telescope effect which, once started, can not be stopped. All damage around the base was caused by the pressure wave from thousands of tons of material crashing down. Buildings many blocks away, suffered structural damage caused by the shock wave and pressure wave.


Now you can keep calling it a conspiracy if you want too, but it doesn't make you look very smart or educated.

Answer 6

I would think that you obviously haven't really read anything or watched any news in the last five years of countless investigations and scientific explanations for why the towers fell because you are too busy believing every lunatic that has the ability to create a conspiracy website.

Why do conspirators mock you for not believing in their .1 percent of socalled proof yet outright deny the 99.9 percent proof staring them in the face?

Answer 7

Which reports are you referring to. The only reports I have read say that although jet fuel combustion does not produce high enough temperatures to melt steel, that explosion in the enclosed, sturdy structure like WTC would certainly cause the steel to melt. The weight of those top floors in return would certainly weigh enough and be hot enough to take the rest of the building down. Don't let this trivial conspiracy theory trouble you.

Answer 8

A steel building cannot collapse at free-fall speed, no matter how “structurally unsound” it might have been, of course, it could have been another miraculous feat performed by those crafty Arabs terrorist on that fateful morn.

Answer 9

David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist, retired in 2001 from Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service. Fellow of the American Physical Society. Fulbright-García Robles Fellow at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Mexico City (1997). Visiting professorships of research at the Universities of Paris and Saint-Etienne, France, and Tokyo Institute of Technology (2000 - 2003). Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005). Winner of the 1993 N.F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL. Principal author of 109 of his 185 published works, a body of work which is highly cited by his peers. Officially credited with largest number of papers (5) by any author on list of 100 most cited articles authored at NRL between 1973 and 1988.
Personal blog 1/5/07: "David Ray Griffin has web-published a splendid, highly footnoted account of The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True: This scholarly work, rich in eyewitness accounts, includes 11 separate pieces of evidence that the World Trade Center towers 1, 2, and 7 were brought down by explosives.

... I implore my fellow physicists and engineers who may have the time, expertise, and (ideally) supercomputer access to get to work on the physics of the World Trade Center collapses and publish their findings in refereed journals like, say, the Journal of Applied Physics.

The issue of knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the “official” assumption that it was the work of 19 Arab amateurs (1) does not match the available facts and (2) has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, repudiation of the Geneva Conventions, and the repeal of habeas corpus (a fundamental point of law that has been with us since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215).

Surely these Orwellian consequences of public ignorance constitute more than sufficient motivation for any patriotic American physicist or engineer to join the search for 9/11 Truth!" http://impactglassman


Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the September 11, 2001 attacks."


Bio: http://impactglassman.blogspot.com/

Answer 10

Because it was an inside job. The sooner our friends in the States realise that the better. Then they can get the real culprits behind it & televise their executions. It would be the highest rated TV show in history. Free people all over the world would be cheering!