Any candidate who accepts money from AIPAC is not going to recieve my vote...so far all of them ( top contenders in both partys) have, thats my position.
Few Americans know that the Israeli lobby in Washington, AIPAC, has been an aggressive advocate of war with Iraq from the very beginning.iii Aided and abetted by insiders Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Richard Pearle, the war in Iraq has claimed between 36-77,000 Iraqi lives─some professorial types allege as many 600,000─and it has blinded, maimed, and wounded upwards of 500,000 Iraqi citizens. Close to 3,000 US soldiers have been killed with 18,000 wounded at this writing.iv This American-initiated carnage, was predicated upon misrepresented, false, perhaps even fraudulent intelligence, and sought to eliminate weapons of mass destruction in a country which did not have any and which never posed any overt threat to the United States.
Some 52 percent of Americans currently feel that the US is in greater danger from terrorism today than before we invaded Iraq. v This causes one to wonder if AIPAC, Wolfowitz, and Pearle agitated so aggressively for this war more to defend American interests or Israeli. Both gentlemen were incessant, even obsessed, with the vaporous Iraqi nuclear threat but doltishly mute on what experts say is Israel’s secret stockpile of over 200 nuclear weapons, including a hydrogen bomb.
As the top Democratic recipient of pro-Israel funds for the 2006 election cycle thus far, pocketing over $58,000 as of October 31 last year, Senator Clinton now has Iran in her crosshairs.
As Sen. Clinton embraces Israel's violence, as well as AIPAC's duplicitous Iran position, she simultaneously ignores the hostilities inflicted upon Palestine, as numerous Palestinians have been killed during the recent shelling of the Gaza Strip. Over the past weeks, Israel continues to mark the occupied territories (they call 'buffer zones') like a frothing-mouth K9 on the loose.
Hillary Clinton's silence toward Israel's brutality implies the senator will continue to support AIPAC's mission to occupy the whole of the occupied territories, as well as a war on Iran in the future. AIPAC's right -- even President Bush appears to be a little sheepish when up against Hillary "Warmonger" Clinton.
2007-03-26 12:28:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by dstr 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I snigger on the folk who help Hilary. it extremely isn't an oppertunity to alter into president for Hilary - that's a "enable's-See-Who-Can-Insult-Bush-The-Worst... contest. definite, she went to college. Yeah, she does comprehend a thank you to throw in some complicated words in her sentances. yet heavily, do you ever hear her communicate approximately the rest, different than complaining how badly Bush is working issues? She says that she will purely snap her arms and pull the troops out of Iraq. would not she comprehend that the terrorist obtainable are nonetheless going to be working obtainable? shall we've numerous extra 9/11's if we enable up our guards long adequate. She says in basic terms what the gang needs to take heed to, like Kerry, because of fact that's excited by the attractiveness.
2016-10-20 12:26:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by corridoni 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This might seem a bias opinion, coming from a man. But i believe just the image of having a female president will be interpreted as a display of weakness in the eyes of other nations. Therefor will not likely happen in the near future.
2007-03-26 12:28:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Luke H 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
And here is this clown TEEJAY'S e-mail to me>>>>>Message: 1969 to 1971 hell you are an old man. a big mouth old man @ that! i would be afraid of a confrontation with an old dude like you, one hit and you would be having a heart attack. why not go take A viagra and find you a young woman(note for you anyone under 60)ha!HA! then again you should be careful not to exert yourself too much!!!OLD MAN!!!!!HA!WHAT A JOKE! again it is real easy to threaten and make invitations from the safety of your computer. go easy rider and ride off into the sunset grand dad!! bye!! .........This is pure and simple folks.....A COWARD who directs his liberal ways to you and if you dont agree, he types internet tough guy messages! And too boot he CRIES to Yahoo about your answer to a question he asked!!!
2007-03-26 16:48:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by MRJERK715 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let see she lets her mentally abusive husband walk all over her - or you could say she puts up with it to gain power--- either way she's a horrible role model for my daughters.
2007-03-26 12:38:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Dang, and here I was going to answser honestly until I saw the rest of your statement...sheesh. Doesn't anyone ask real questions anymore?
2007-03-26 12:26:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by CC 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
To be perfectly honest with myself, I hereby invoke the 5th Amendment on the grounds that it may incriminate me!!
2007-03-26 12:30:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by fuzzypetshop 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. But I must remain as anonymous as possible
P.S. By the way i did not have sexual relations with that woman.
2007-03-26 12:35:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ponch 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
She knows Washington and New York.
She and Gore would make a great team.
Barack Obama in 2016
2007-03-26 12:27:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
No, not in the least good, Bad choice, loser, liar, female dog in heat
SHE
C an't
U nderstand
N ormal
T hinking
2007-03-26 12:27:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋