Why do people think & claim to support the troops while not supporting the war or even the president no matter what party he is. I'm not just talking this war but all wars back to Vietnam back to Korea back to WW2 back to WW1 so on. A soldier is suppose to fight when called upon to do so no matter the reasons or politics or even the support of the "people" but when you claim to support him while speaking out against or doubting him & what he is doing & risking his life for it just wrong. You cant fight a war without loses you cant always perdict the enemy or a battle but just like in sports you have to let the players do their jobs. We call people who like a team or even a player say the Yankee's or Barry Bonds when they are winning or hitting homers but who guerr them when they aren't is just arrrgh. Its life there are good days & bad & you can't support someone yet not support what they do its contradicting & unfair. Why do people think you can when you can't?
2007-03-26
12:07:08
·
6 answers
·
asked by
bpeter3196
5
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
No one wants war or people to die but sadly war for the past & time being seems to be a part of life & you cant claim to support the troops but ask or expect them to win with their hands time, over night, & without some bad days especially when congress ties their hands in the hope of saying political careers & PR. Too me it should be criminal for people to flip flop & for people like Hillary Clinton, Obama, other democrats to claim that holding money from the troops & then putting benchmarks to the money in order for them to get it when they need it. When a unit goes to war & everyone comes back its funny how noone but family is there lining the streets especially from the media. But if a unit goes & gets hit especially extra hard then everyone comes out supposeably in support & yet if you ask most soldiers they say they'd rather not be known for their loses but for the successes & what those whom didnt make it home worked hard for to accomplish.
2007-03-26
13:25:10 ·
update #1
This is to S.K. doubt you will see this but in case. Your "Changing the job" redictulious especially since no one especially Democrats have stated what that their "new" job is. It helps to finish one job before taking another job especially if as the media & democrats claim that we are under manned military wise. A comment that I find funny given that they & their dictator crony Billary cut funding & down sized the military during his evil reign. Does it make sense for a painter painting a house to in the middle of the job pick up & leave one job claiming to have another one just because he doesnt like the color or that particular job? Face it you can't support the troops & not support what they do. You dont have to support the war itself but you cant claim to support them & cut funding or tie their hands yet expect them to do the job they are currently doing. There is a difference between supporting them & what they do without supporting the war. Using them as political pons is wrong
2007-03-26
18:34:21 ·
update #2