2007-03-26 11:17:54 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Thank you all for your answers. I was just suggesting that things that are voted on by 9 supreme court judges should not be the law of the land.
And those of you that are pro-choice, will you and the other pro-choicers give your time and money to the "How do you live with youself after aborting a Child Club" I have known a few women that had abortions and the lifelong pain one can see on their faces tells it all.
2007-03-27 06:10:30 · update #1
definitely, although it shouldn't be necessary -- there are
already laws against homocide and matricide
2007-03-26 11:24:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Killing babies only affects the woman....so by that rationale child birth only affects the woman as well?
As a Christian social conservative I would like to see the murder of unborn children stopped.
However, as a political conservative I am torn as to whether or not the government should regulate this issue. On the same note I do not think that the government should ever pay for one (condone) or provide the mental or medical health care afterward. There is a high rate of depression and/or suicide after abortion, that is the consequence of your decisions. You will forever have killed your child. I do not think that the government should have any involvement in the treatment.
I am very much Pro-Life and do not feel abortion is a viable answer in any circumstance. But I do not feel that that government should be involved in anyway - for or against.
2007-03-26 18:27:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bring abortion up to the forefront however if that's to be done then the issue of Child support should also be adhered to that issue. Anyone who is not paying child support should have to face sterilization.
If the government is going to have a say on the uterus, they need to have a say in the testis too.
Sterilization to keep welfare down. Welfare Something so many cons seems to blame the liberals for...
2007-03-26 18:45:00 · answer #3 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you outlaw abortion, you basically guarantee that illegal abortion clinics will spring up for poor women. They won't be clean or licenced, so women will die as well as the babies they may have had. Wealthy women, on the other hand, will be able to fly to countries where they can get it done legally. This is always the way it has been when abortions were illegal and it seems like it simply punishes the poor without having any overall effect on preventing abortions.
2007-03-26 18:23:48 · answer #4 · answered by charmedchiclet 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no "Christian" majority. Christianity is just as fractured as is Islam, perhaps even more so. Without the Jews and Muslims to kick around, the Catholics and the Protestants would be at each others throats, just as they have been in Europe for the last 500 years...
2007-03-26 18:23:36 · answer #5 · answered by vt500ascott 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You, the pseudo-Christian so-called majority can vote on anything you want.
You are never going to stop abortion. It has existed for thousands of years. You are never going to overturn Roe v Wade and you will never be able to force a woman to give birth if she doesn't want to.
So, go ahead and waste some more of your time....that's what you people do anyway.
2007-03-26 18:54:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hate to tell you, but out of the 300 denominations, there are many Christians that believe only God can judge and it is a sin to judge, as some Christian denominations do. You keep your kind of Christianity and I'll keep mine.
2007-03-26 18:34:23 · answer #7 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Any law that's passed would go through a legal challenge.
I think it's time the USSC revisited this issue, considering it's actually a state issue, not a federal one. They should overturn themselves, effectively.
2007-03-26 18:32:49 · answer #8 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It shore would pass, even if just women voted for it!
Most women I know are pro-life. Plus, they are usually better looking because they are not as "loose" as the pro-choicers
2007-03-26 18:31:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets see, are you for it or against it, I think that most people that favor abortion, are Christian, so I guess you are for it,. I am not a christian, and I am against it. So bring on your vote, you will probably win. but I will still vote against it.
2007-03-26 18:31:20 · answer #10 · answered by niddlie diddle 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We as christains, and I am one, have no right to judge the actions of others. Our faith is partly based on the premise that we forgive and we dont judge others as judgment is the lords. We need to practice what we preech, before we preech.
2007-03-26 18:24:09 · answer #11 · answered by Papa Joe 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋