Democrats on this site do not support the 1st Amendment.?

Question

They can call me an ignorant nazi, neocon, and call me crazy......

But I use the term dimwit,,, and my answer gets pulled.

Could they be anymore hypocrticial?

I know because a Yahoo Answers person did it, the email stated so, and I highly doubt that a republican did, that would not make anysense. Esp since dimwit is not vulgar.

Thank you Democrats for proving my point, not one of you had a problem with it. So in actuallity you only support your own freedom of speach.

Answer 1

Can you prove those that you insulted are the ones who pulled your answer? If not, your point is moot.

So what you're saying, is that yahoo specifically stated that a liberal reported you, and that is why your answer was pulled, right? Did it ever occur to you that your answer was pulled because of your decision to use ignorance instead of intelligence? Something to think about.

BTW, I am neither liberal nor conservative, so I tend not to have any preconceived notions about others. I judge people on their actions, not affiliations.

Answer 2

Are you even sure who did it?? It's awful assuming to think a dem did that when you have no idea.. Maybe do you have someone who doesn't like an answer you gave on previous questions?? Maybe a person who just goes around looking for silly reasons to red flag people.. It happens all the time to me and some of my responses when I'm not careful of the wording.. Wouldn't it be wrong of me to assume that a conservative did that to me simply because they just don't like the 1st ammendment?? You need facts before you accuse... It could have been anyone.. so don't assume... Actually I'd love to hear your point of view no matter if I agree with it or not..

WHY IS IT THAT YOU ASKED A SIMPLE QUESTION AND EVERYONE IS BASHING THE OPOSITE PARTY HERE?? IS THIS JUST A FORUM TO TOSS NAMES AND SHOW IGNORANCE? THIS WAS JUST A SIMPLE QUESTION.. NOT AN OPENING TO STATE YOUR POLITICAL VIEWS AND BASH OTHER PEOPLE MAKING A STATEMENT IN REFERENCE TO HER QUESTION.

I've taken many insults on here and have read and even posted a couple myself, but I have only reported one person and that was yesterday when i read answer after answer to many different questions and read all his questions and he kept saying he intended to kill the president.. To me that man is sick and needed to be reported.. Even though I don't agree with Bush on many issues I would never toss a threat like that out or would I even say it.. That one deserved to be reported and I hope the FBI gets that sicko.. And thats the only reason I would report someone.

Answer 3

You know the rules and know what happens when you break them. So quit complaining and follow the rules... It's that simple. There is no need for name calling. If someone is stupid, or a dimwit, then their actions will tell everybody... You pointing this out to people is like you repeating what someone else has just said... In this case it's the "dimwit".

I call people names on here, but I also expect to get that answer deleted.

Answer 4

It's got nothing to do with democratic or republican affiliation. A lot of people on this site are awfully thin skinned and can't take even an ounce of criticism or stand to be the butt of a joke. Being a tattle-tale pu$$y, unfortunately, runs across party lines...

Answer 5

I am a Democrat, and I might not agree with you on many issues. But I believe we could all disagree in a more mature manner.
I also wish Yahoo would only pull answers/questions that are actually bad, not every single thing that offends some sensitive baby.

Answer 6

No. they are actually not racist. they are elitist. Many in the team are particularly inspired via way of the President being from Texas and "speaking humorous", taking that accessory as some manifestation of low intelligence. same style of knee-jerk reaction got here approximately whilst Lyndon Baines Johnson grew to alter into President after the loss of life of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. George Soros is completely a nicely-heeled, modern-day Pied Piper of Hamblin and he's attracted lots of "young ones" along with his funds. After the election of 2006, whilst the Democrats regained manage of the domicile and Senate, he grew to become into as quickly as overheard to assert: "We offered a occasion!".

Answer 7

You accuse the dem's of stifling your right to free speech but it's the republicans who are trying to rewright history to suit their own ends. One example is the FACT that Saddam told us that he had disposed off all weapons of mass destruction but we invaded on that assumption alone and lo and behold there ain't any, so the republicans just change history to make the Iraqi's responsible for 9/11, but guess what it twernt them. How will they change history next?

Answer 8

Do you refer to the staff who are responsible for editing the site's content or the people who respond to your questions/statement?

If you were not allowed to post any content, that would be an infringement on your 1st amendment rights. That doesn't seem to be the case.

Answer 9

...neocon isn't an offensive comment...and ignorant Nazi is nothing compared to what some conservatives call us...lets look at the list shall we?

-"libertard"
-"LIEberal"
-"anti-american"
-"islamofascists"
-"communists"
-"yellow bellies"
-"pansies"

I'm not saying you're answer should get pulled but i mean come on, those two things are nothing...

Answer 10

what makes you think that the democrats are after you... that's just plain stupid. to offend people like that... i mean, what kind of questions do you even have to ASK to get such a strong response from people?


ps: i'm a republican...