To an American there is no life more valuable than an American.
I would expect you to feel the same way about Belgium lives.
But life is valuable, and we don't really consciously think the way you are asking us to.
What's with all the provocation today?
2007-03-26 10:24:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
you asked two questions. is an american life worth more than an iraqi life? to an American, yes. (try acting like civilized humans, then we'll talk again)
then you asked, Is an American unborn worth more than an Iraqi Child? are you asking the difference between an unborn fetus and someone already born?
first why are you making a difference between American or Iraqi. why don't you ask Hitler if a pile of dog crap was worth more than a Jew? born or otherwise? it's all your perspective. answer your own question.
Finally, who's killing more iraqi's now, Americans? watch the news you putz (thats yiddish for......)
2007-03-26 10:21:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Doctor Pain 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure what your inferring in this question. You should put more detail in your question because it is obviously a loaded question that you have a particular feeling on.
I think all life is precious and everyone should value it. Unfortunately, many people in the world do not value human life, whether it be that of an unborn child, a child, or an adult.
The other unfortunate thing is that in the course of maintaining freedom and defeating evil in the world there will be innocent people that die.
Nothing in the world is free, including freedom itself.
It must be fought for and defended on a daily basis.
I hope this helps answer your question from at least my perspective.
2007-03-26 10:12:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by InReality01 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
All lives are priceless. But in matters of war, that is irrelevant. You are trying to make an anti-war statement. But unfortunately, it doesn't work.
Pretend it's 1943. OK. Is an American life worth more than a Nazi life? The simple answer is no. But we still had to defeat Hitler, and unfortunately the only way to accomplish that was through all-out war. Would you have walked away?
Besides, our soldiers are over there protecting Iraqi children. It's the islamofascists and the saddamites who are killing them.
2007-03-26 10:21:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by boonietech 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends which life. Sorry to say some life is worth more than others. An innocent Iraqi child's life is worth more than the rapist murderer, John Evander Couey's life.
http://crime.about.com/b/a/166938.htm
But an American soldier's life is worth more than an terrorist's life.
All depends who you are talking about. The example you say, I'd say the same.
But the unfortunate fact is sometimes in war innocent people die. Sometimes we have to accept. Sad, but true.
2007-03-26 10:20:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by robling_dwrdesign 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on whether your an American or an Iraqi .
2007-03-26 10:15:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your dreaming, whilst i do no longer consider the actual incontrovertible fact that there is numerous international places in Iraq to attempt and settle the rustic down after the dictator who ran the rustic with the help of stress and homicide. the region is now that there is 3 TRIBES (no longer political communities) that all and sundry % to run the rustic so each physique needs to be in value. If the allies have been to now stop the action and leave the rustic it would create a vaccum and the rustic might have yet another Saddam interior the seat. and remember approximately like WW1 and WW2 the allies did no longer initiate the action, IRAQ invaded Kuwait interior the ninety's
2016-10-20 12:13:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by benavidez 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Apparently not to the "insurgents" who put 2 Iraqi children into a car, to get it past a checkpoint, then exploded it with the children still in the car.
Apparently not to the "insurgents" who bomb schools and marketplaces where children are.
2007-03-26 10:11:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Depends... are you an Iraqi or an American?
2007-03-26 10:45:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brandi H 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. They are all equal, but anyone on one side of a multi-faceted story will always be subject to the opinions and observations of his or her bias or organization. That's universal. More often than not, you will agree with your allies, and/or peers before you even consider the oppositions view. That is human nature.
2007-03-26 10:14:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rick R 5
·
1⤊
0⤋