English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A 2nd alternative to one of the most bloodiest wars on history. When Hitler joined up with the German Battalion during WWI and have he not got out of his fox hole, he would be killed. Lets put in this way he got killed.However this, backfires.
The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics under Joseph Stalin has grown increasingly powerful. Had Hitler risen to power, Germany would have emerged as the balancing power standing in the way of Stalin's ambitions. Instead, left unchecked, the Soviet Union proceeds by seizing lands from neighbors and then invading Eastern Europe in order to achieve Stalin's dream of a Soviet Union stretching across the entire Eurasian landmass. The nations of Europe form into the Alliance, and over the course of the history, the Allies and the Soviets battle for control of the European continent.
West Germany, 1950's. To avoid certain collapse, the Soviet army boldly advances into Europe. In an alternate history, where Allied Forces defend Europe against Soviets.

2007-03-26 10:01:12 · 5 answers · asked by GoAndComeback 1 in Arts & Humanities History

This would result in another WWII, Hitler is killed during WWI. Stalin a mad man and unpredictable man would be able to start a war with the West and the East.

Japan would remain still with war with the UNITED STATES. But w/o Germany, the years following would replace the 1933-1945 would be stituated the decade after that the 1950's. WOuld this be idolized into another alternative to WWII?

China, North Korea, Vietnam and other countries would remain in communists influence following the defeat of the Japanese in 1945, until a decade later 1950's Stalin sets his plan in motion to invade the entire continetal Europe with Chinese, Korean, and other communist troops.

Cuba would remain in communist power, to put USA in check by threatening Soviet ICBMS nukes to the shores of the USA. Chinese and other fleets would remain in complete baracade of the Soviets to protect any threats.

New alternative WWII would result in the 1950??
What do you think??/ No dumbies Here

2007-03-26 10:01:56 · update #1

5 answers

Huh? It is more likely that without a strong Germany to worry Uncle Joe, Russia and Japan would have gone at it, as the Japanese would have seen Russia, not the U.S., as the main block on thier road to Asian reunification. With no love of Russia, and no direct attack by Japan, the U.S. never would have harnassed its industrial might to conquor facism, meaning that the victor in the Russia/Japan showdown, Round 2 (Remember the Russo-Japanses War of 1906?) would have been Big Boy on the Block. And the U.S. *still* wouldn't have mobilized, because the U.S. post WWI mobilization plans depended upon mobilization and training happening in FRANCE, and with a free France, the U.S. would have been complacent. And if Russia beat France, by then it would have been too late for the U.S. to do anything, because Uncle Joe, having whacked Japan already, would have no second front to worry about....

2007-03-26 11:26:51 · answer #1 · answered by Dr_Adam_Bricker 3 · 1 0

You totally over estimate the power of the USSR. Remember that a Communist economic system is weak. A war against allied Western European powers would have brought the USSR down, particularly with Amertican help. The US would have been at war with Japan regardless of the events in Europe, so the US's industrial might would have won the day. The Germans would have been rearmed by the west, and in a close alliance with Britain (Britain and Germany never warred until WWI). would have defeated the USSR. After the Japanese defeat, the US would invade the USSR from the east, and force the Soviets to fight a 2 front war. The key would have been the US. The result would have prevented the Cold War, but it would have probably extended European colonialism by a few years. Throw in technological advances by the Europeans and Americans (radar, missles, Naval strength, atom bombs), the USSR would have been defeated handily.

The Japanese needed resources that they received thru Manchuria, and Indonesia (oil), so Japan's focus was on the Pacific and SE Asia. Their next move was to establish an alliance with India against the British.

Regardless of the perceived superiority of the T 34 tank, you cancel that out with the p 51 Mustang and superior air cover of the Western Alliance. Stalin would need an alliance with the Japanese to hold Americans at bay, but with no success. Again technology of the West triumphs. The USSR would have been defeated by superior industrial and technological forces of the West.

2007-04-03 01:12:14 · answer #2 · answered by BlueDart 2 · 0 0

what book you got this from ive seen it but cant remember what it is. well realistically we always saw russia as a threat but needed them as an ally without them we would have been defeated as the eastern front kept forces off our own. they had the T34 the best tank off the war and possibly ever. we had a cold war which was to do with the threat of the russians but it was mainly a war of words and struggle to get first man into space and drop the first A bomb which the americans did as a warning to stalin

2007-03-26 10:08:05 · answer #3 · answered by wierd and wounderful world of me 5 · 0 0

And so new alternative history answer here is that left unchecked the question is not yet to be known or answered. In the most bloodiest question and of answers stated for a new WWF is that had he not got the question we would now know the answer. To power of that we do not yet know and will have alternative to battle for Best Answer and control of world if it backfires.

2007-03-26 10:18:33 · answer #4 · answered by View from a horse 3 · 0 0

submit to in techniques that nationalism is an evil. 2 Wars value 70 million human lives. After the wars a chilly conflict replaced into began between Capitalism and Communism. Now all is over. people ought to think of in terms of peace and co-operation. Please constantly physique your question top.

2016-10-19 23:53:16 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers