Is Belgium's refusal to confront Iran the beginning of the end of Belgium's imperialism?

Question

Since Belgium will not confront Iran on the illegal seizure of the British Navy personnel, and since Belgium will not confront Iran on their seeking nuclear weapons, does this signal the END of the strong Belgian leadership role and imperialistic ambitions in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East?

No, wait! Belgium hasn't world events since they invented the waffles and the saxophone! Ha ha ha!

there's a difference between peaceful and passive.
The US was peaceful with Russia during Cold War, but not passive.

Answer 1

The international ethics commision in Brussels has noted your post and will be trying you in abstensia for criminal political incorrectness.

Answer 2

Belgium has no imperialist ambitions. And Belgians are not a aggressif people. So what ? Should the Belgians declare war to Iran ?
This is a matter of the UN where the Belgians have always been a loyal member what not can be said of some other countries.

Is Belgium passive : I don't think so. For a small country it has a lot of UN mission done and on going. At this moment : f.e. Lebanon and Aghanistan. Before the Balkan (some units are still there), Somalia, Ethiopia, Ruanda, Korea, Cambodja, ...

By the way the EU main office is in Brussels in Belgium, not the Netherlands

Answer 3

Belgium after giving up their colonies in the 1960's took a backseat role in world affairs.

Answer 4

The EU capitol is in the Netherlands. Thus the pounding the US dollar has faced since the Euro is a direct result of them affecting global issues.

Answer 5

It's that split language thing they have there.

Part French, Part Flemish. The former should explain a lot.

Answer 6

Belguim is a peaceful nation, nor is it imperialist.

But they do make great food!