I find that hard to believe, that a state that voted like 98% republican would vote for a Democratic candidate.
2007-03-26 09:36:15 · 17 answers · asked by Bubba 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LOL, I don't have a crystal ball yet, or I wouldn't be here, I would be somewhere on the beach chillin and looking.
2007-03-26 09:45:59 · answer #1 · answered by Little J 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Democrats need a simple majority, not a "Super majority" to win in a Presidential election.
I do not follow the logic of your question, other than you're commenting that you believe that a certain state should not support a Democratic candidate in the future election because of its poltical demographics.
2007-03-26 09:43:11 · answer #2 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here' why:
"Stay the Course" is not a solution, it's not a strategy and it's not acceptable. In following the same course of action the President has completely failed us. He sent our troops to war without the equipment they needed, based on false pretenses. He ignored evidence and cherry-picked facts to suit his purpose.
What is our plan to succeed in Iraq and at what point can our troops begin to return home? These are the questions the American people have been asking and the questions the President has no answer for.
Will the President ever admit that? Will Republicans in Congress hold the President and his Administration accountable for the mess they have made? ....Yes, in the next election.
2007-03-26 09:44:55 · answer #3 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since 31% of America consider themselves Democrat and 28% GOP the majority of voters are "independent". All the DNC has to do is get 47% of the middle to get a majority....and a win.
There is no state that voted 98% GOP.
2007-03-26 09:41:27 · answer #4 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I do not think so, also they did not take enough seats and are already showing their butts, they will likely actaully lose seats because they are in charge now as they are found of saying and they are doing stupid things. So in the next election I can only imagine them lossing seats.
Historically they should have had a huge gain in this last election and gained a large number of seats almost all, however that did not happen and the only reason they control the senate is because of 2 independants. Having said that they are more active republicans in the senate than democrats.
Pelosi is sinking your party enjoy.
2007-03-26 09:41:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't matter if it is a super majority or not, 1 vote can decide the elections and after all the mess made by "Mr." Bush and his mindless robots 1 is more than good enough, that's all we need to have a good change and to stop the lies and the worthless sacrifice of our men and women.
2007-03-26 09:41:51 · answer #6 · answered by Javy 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, but in terms of Congress, one can hope though. And NO good will EVER come for the Constitution if the Repukes have the power to have crooked elections. Can we at least agree that there should be HONEST elections where ALL the votes are counted? Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2007-03-26 09:43:17 · answer #7 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
How can anyone provide you proof to the future of an election that has not even happened yet?
2007-03-26 09:39:13 · answer #8 · answered by Groovy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is hard to believe that would happen.
BUT, the Dems will win in 2008.
2007-03-26 09:39:09 · answer #9 · answered by Villain 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The website you need is:
www.deluded-liberals.com
Let's elect hillary and let another clinton make a joke out of the whitehouse.
2007-03-26 09:39:48 · answer #10 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋