They babble, they are unattractive, they are not witty, the are sensationalist wannabe journalists, they make a lot of money, they sure turn me off but that doesn't count. Why do you like both or either of them so much to make them rich and famous?
2007-03-26 08:23:01 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I'm on your side.
Bill O'reilly said it best. "The pool of free thinking Americans is shrinking".
Most people are followers. The one who can get people riled the most, can make a lot of money.
Small-minded people need a leader, hence the Taliban. Lemmings are world wide looking for a preacher to lead them somewhere.
2007-03-26 08:31:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, they are much different (content wise) but are similar in the way of how they tackle current events. They ask questions. Most morning shows only report the news. They report the news and then analyze it. They take callers that are close to whatever they are covering. And they do it with crude "workin' man" attitude. Most people can relate more to someone that talks in lamens. I don't really like them, but they do put a new perspective on some issues. They also teach people to keep an open mind.
2007-03-26 08:34:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rude sells.
2007-03-26 10:38:26 · answer #3 · answered by fkd1015 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋