Doesn't it make more sense that, I don't know, actually *listening* to each other may help more than screaming at the other side in what, essentially, amounts to two 3 year olds having an argument?
Instead of hurling epithets, slogans and insults at each other, wouldn't it be better if we actually had a dialogue, instead of so many brazen examples of hate on both sides?
Or am I just crazy?
2007-03-26 08:05:46 · 6 answers · asked by witchiebunny 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh, and the last part?
Rhetorical, before I get any smart @$$ed answers.
2007-03-26 08:09:05 · update #1
To the first poster:
where have I displayed open hate?
I can be sarcastic and condescending, but if you *really* check my answers, I call more for a dialogue and less for "LYNCH THE CONS!"
Try researching. It might be fun.
2007-03-26 08:11:33 · update #2
I don't know. Is it crazy to criticize others for doing what you, yourself, just did?
Edit: Keep hating. It's fun to watch you.
2007-03-26 08:09:14 · answer #1 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
people who actually know what they are talking about can do what you say.. some don't just for fun.. but many can and do... those that just throw slurs usually don't have an opinion of their own.. they are just repeating what they have been told to say.. and so they become angry because they do not understand their beliefs... if they were the type of person who could spend the time thinking about it and forming their own beliefs they most likely would have already... so they are stuck with the anger of being questioned with no way out other than to deny anything else as a valid possibility and to resort to tactics that make you look like less in their eyes so that they can feel better about themselves.. this is an unfortunate part of human nature.
2007-03-26 08:23:00 · answer #2 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are people on both sides willing to intelligently debate issues but they are overwhelmingly outnumbered by the infantile reactionaries.
2007-03-26 08:13:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i could help my political occasion each and all of the extra, because of the fact they are of course able to manipulating the international and re-writing historic previous. a trifling mortal like myself could by no skill have the skill to compete with such a huge and useful gadget. certainly my ideals could replace, besides the shown fact that it does not rely because of the fact my voice could of course be drowned out via the occasion. i does not swap events, because of the fact i could understand that any occasion that can replace the concepts attributed to Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Tsunetomo, and different philosophers is in all risk manipulating the different political philosophers who created the different events as nicely. i've got faith that info can replace ideals as certainly as ideals can replace info (yet i'd desire to be incorrect), i could stay in my political occasion out of a feeling of worry and uselessness, not because of the fact of any "center" ideals.
2016-11-23 17:14:09 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with sparhawk. You just need to know who will debate and who are the partisan name callers(and their aliases) and ignore the latter.
2007-03-26 08:19:18 · answer #5 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They know it won't...both sides just think that their way is the only way.
2007-03-26 08:09:44 · answer #6 · answered by The Cult of Personality 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋