i have to do a debate at school but i need help with something...?

Question

i need to defend the war in iraq from a republican standpoint but i can't find anything i can say. please help me!

Answer 1

You can start with the fact that Iraq violated 17 treaty resolutions since it was defeated in 1991 and run out of Kuwait. Among those 17 was failure to report on the disposition of its chemical weapons stockpile. According to the treaty, Iraq was subject to UN inspection, especially of no-fly zones. Saddam Hussein violated these by using ground and weapons systems to target NATO and UN pilots flying these zones. Clinton had to bomb Iraq twice to force them to comply, and the UN passed and enforced UN sanctions on Iraq that did not work. Hussein tried to develop a nuclear weapons program and actually sent an envoy to Niger to get a deal on plutonium and uranium. This was confirmed by British Intelligence.

Even the UN inspectors found clear evidence when they went into Iraq that Saddam was hiding a cache of WMD. Every time they came close, the UN was booted out of Iraq. This is confirmed by several former Iraqi military officials who say, yes they were transporting their stockpiles around the country, and had actually moved most of the WMD to Syria via air just before the United States and its allies invaded.

In 2001, Saddam opened Iraq to Al Qaeda so they could send their wounded to Iraq. He authorized al-Zarqawi to initiate training camps for Al Qaeda jihadists and terrorists to return to Afghanistan or continue terrorism around the world. He used money to encourage and spread terrorism in Israel and abroad by funding families of suicide bombers.

Left unattended to, Iraq was a ticking timebomb and after 9/11 which tells us that the United States is not protected from the world by two oceans after all, we the people and the American Congress decided that if we acted preemptively, we could avoid countless disasters by removing Saddam Hussein from power and replacing it with a government elected by the people.

Answer 2

If you need to support the war, then you might want to argue that the troop surge is already having a profound effect in Baghdad.

Another thing you might want to consider is that having 3000 troops die over a span of 4 years is a better alternative than having the enormous number of casualties from an all out civil war. They can argue that there is a civil war now, but any decent rebuttal would include how the violence will not go away and the problem will only be exacerbated, as stated in the Baker Hamilton report.

Stay away from "defending against terrorism" and "protecting liberty," they are too trite.

Answer 3

I have acquaintances in speech & debate club, that are for sure no longer at your factor, besides the indisputable fact that the idea is an same: there are going to be arguments that you received't like. the biggest ingredient is to study both fringe of the problem; or you may as well stay at residing house and save your opinion to your self. human beings only opt for to percentage recommendations with the intention to study; that isn't any longer too healthful to take it in my opinion, no offense. So, like really some debates i'm efficient, only push your evaluations aside and really imagine about it. really, don't be shy with it like such an outstanding form of politicians. I propose, why could the opinion exist if it did not make experience to someone accessible? only provide it your ideal shot; and probability is, you'll study some thing too. i'd no longer understand you in any respect, and could purely be 15 myself (and incredibly out of the closet) yet i does no longer opt for to work out you scrap a probable solid scholarship over an opinion which won't be able to even change the end result. the controversy received't change, you'll nonetheless argue antagonistic to what you've self belief in; besides the indisputable fact that, it has the potential to regulate your existence. So i'm asking-is it really honest to you to save your silence now at the same time as it may grant you with the potential to regulate 1000's of human beings's minds later? i wish you get to this message in the previous you're making up your concepts. solid success!

Answer 4

Try something along the lines of we are there in assistance to defending a young democracy. That is what one soldier that just was killed stated in a letter back home.

Answer 5

You'll be searching for awhile. Try using the rove talking points.

Answer 6

PLEASE , I WILL GIVE YOU INFO BUT NEED TO FORWARD IT FROM SEVERAL SOURCES... FEEL FREE TO E-MAIL ME AT xytus3 at the yahoo place and I'll send you some good materials for a debate!

Answer 7

Blah Blah Blah. There we did you're work for you.

Answer 8

sorry your asking the wrong people...you need to ask Bush...he has all the answers, even if they are not right.