The Arabs attacked Israel in 1967, but somehow expected Israel to return all it's land as if nothing had happened. It just seems to me that if you're the agressor, you can't expect the complete return after your defeat. What is the Arab answer for this expectation?
2007-03-26 07:21:32 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
israel has been recognized as the aggressor in 1967, otherwise it would have annexed the land as it did for the previous wars. but the UN explicitly stated that the land couldn't belong to israel. territorial expansion through war and aggression is no longer tolerated by civilized countries.
2007-03-27 05:52:15 · answer #1 · answered by maroc 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Arabs are not the agressors. You are forgetting thaat arabs were living in blissful peace until Israel was created, displacing millions of arabs. Israel is not content with taking the majority of Palestine they won't more, thus the settlement expansion continues rapidly.
2007-03-30 00:54:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually no one attacked Israel in 1967,Israel attacked three Arab countries...So maybe because they were attacked they expect those lands back...and maybe because international law says that the Israeli occupation on those lands it's illegal and it should be ended...
2007-03-26 14:53:05 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Logic & reason have nothing to do with things. They don't want Israel to return to the 67 lines, they want Israel to disappear.
2007-03-26 20:29:05 · answer #4 · answered by James B 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Israeli fanatic leaders want to keep occupying land that was never part of Israel and there is no country is willing to recognize that land is part of Israel.
2007-03-26 15:53:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They deny the facts like the iranians deny the holocaust.
2007-03-29 01:09:26 · answer #6 · answered by Gab200512 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
because they are out of tough with reality
2007-03-26 20:55:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋