2007-03-26 06:59:41 · 8 answers · asked by awesomeguitar36 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
In the early years, Vince Neil, but now it is definitely Bret Michaels. Neil blew out his voice years ago and can no longer hit the notes. He doesn't even sing all the words live now. He will often skip lyrics because he can't remember them or get out of breath. Neither one has much range.
2007-03-26 07:10:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think both are good, I mean they are great singers but Brett sings a power ballad that will make ya cry and Vince can rock a song and make you wanna get up and raise some hell. So both are great just in different ways.
2007-03-26 08:22:42 · answer #2 · answered by QueenFan0946 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Vince Neil. He has a much higher voice and a wider range.
2007-03-26 07:08:27 · answer #3 · answered by JudasHero 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I always liked Vince Neil's voice better. It's grittier. I can almost hear the Marlboros and Jack Daniels in his voice.
2007-03-26 07:03:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
back in the 80s i would have said vince, but today it's definitely bret
2007-03-26 07:44:11 · answer #5 · answered by cheryld34 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither, but brett looks better, or did anyways.
Just my perspective.
The music I prefered was Motley crue.
but poison was pretty good too.
2007-03-26 07:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i prefer motley crue,even though i do like poison too!
2007-03-26 07:08:09 · answer #7 · answered by mom_princess77 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hair bands suck a**!!! Glenn Danzig RULZ!!! 777
2007-03-26 07:35:46 · answer #8 · answered by HorrorPunkDude 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋