Why not go to an actual scientific organization website and see what they have been saying about global warming. I have compiled a list of such organizations and their statements supporting man made global warming. I'm at work, so I don't have the list. However, below is a link to a website with a list of links to geological/climatic/meteorological organizations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_meteorology_institutions
Note this list is missing NASA and the National Academy of Science.
2007-03-26 06:04:22 · 9 answers · asked by soldier_of_god 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
HERE'S AN EXAMPLE:
The American Meteorological Society endorses the "Joint Academies' Statement: Global Response to Climate Change"
http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/jointacademies.html
Climate change is real
It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)2. This warming has already led to changes in the Earth's climate.
But human activities are now causing
atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases – including carbon dioxide, methane, tropospheric ozone,
and nitrous oxide – to rise well above pre-industrial levels.
http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf
2007-03-26 06:05:04 · update #1
Why is it cons responded to my scientific websites with partisan political websites?
I go straight to the source. Conservatives go to right-wing political website and say here go read this.
2007-03-26 06:27:36 · update #2
Umm... no.
Try I've done all my research from many sources.
Man made global warming is insignificant.
2007-03-26 06:07:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Your source is biased, it makes funds on worldwide warming duh? Watch this methodology the great worldwide Warming Swindle, not that it will exchange your techniques on the grounds which you look out of touch with certainty, yet those anybody is scientists, in the sector, have studied the undertaking for their entire careers, and an excellent variety of have been on the IPCC unique panel. You do know what that's? The panel did not write the outcomes and comments, politicians and bureaucrats wrote, took the information out of context, exaggerated and by using in some lies and voila, poultry little has arrived. This factor is approximately funds and administration. it particularly is in essence the hot rallying element for the worlds socialists, we could tell them a huge LIE that every physique will agree is powerful, and then tax them horrifically, then take administration of their governments. Geez you people particularly amaze me.
2016-10-19 23:26:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The great global warming swindle.
2007-03-26 06:12:24 · answer #3 · answered by jeb black 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why do liberals get their global warming news from Cartoon Network?
2007-03-26 06:38:48 · answer #4 · answered by Armed Civilian 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=3400
http://www.naparegister.com/articles/2007/02/13/opinion/commentary/doc45d1c73a4439e555929206.txt
http://scientificblog.newsvine.com/_news/2006/11/15/442374-man-made-global-warming-hoax
You are not as right as you think you are, I am certain global warming is fake as man only accounts for 4% of carbon emissions
2007-03-26 06:12:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think almost everyone agrees there is natural warming of the earth. Al Gores global warming is a myth. Go back to work.
2007-03-26 06:08:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Because they only listen to people who agree with them. Which is why they have no great thinkers or really contribute anything to society.
2007-03-26 06:09:12 · answer #7 · answered by guy o 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
since so many conservatives refer to 'manbearpig'...I'm thinking they get most of their information from South Park episodes.
2007-03-26 06:11:09 · answer #8 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Because science scares cons.
2007-03-26 06:07:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋