Are there any legitimate scientist's who are actively pursuing this currently? And how come it is taking so long?
2007-03-26 05:00:53 · 4 answers · asked by mickpolaris 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Zoology
The term sasquatch, for the North American primate under consideration in this website, is an anglicized derivative of the word "Sésquac", meaning "wild man". The original word, in the Stó:lõ dialect of the Halkomelem language, is used by the Coast Salish Indians of the Fraser Valley and parts of Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Indian tribes across North America have a total of more than sixty different terms for the sasquatch.
Bigfoot was a journalistic term generated in the middle of the last century during a rash of sightings in Northern California; its use is not unreasonable since the species has proportionally much bigger feet than those of human beings and, furthermore, the word has come to be recognized widely. A goodly selection of fanciful terms have been used by pioneers and later non-native inhabitants of North America for the occasional published and repeated encounters with sasquatches.
The description given here is derived from a compilation of thousands of eye witness reports from the entire continent, some of astounding length, detail, and corroborative evidence; the Patterson movie, taken in 1967, and a recent computer-based image analysis of it; and statistical analysis of a large database accumulated over the last fifty years, primarily by John Green
2007-03-26 05:04:23 · answer #1 · answered by kitkat 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only with a magical faerie net.
2007-03-26 05:08:16 · answer #2 · answered by greeneyedprincess 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No and it's not the photographer's fault, bigfoot is blurry.
2007-03-26 05:03:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. I shot the last one and had it stuffed.
2007-03-26 05:04:04 · answer #4 · answered by Grant d 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋