will there be another ww3, why or why not, need support?

Answer 1

Though conemara is probably right I'll answer this anyhow.

There's 2 options really, and you have to think them through.

If there was a WW3, it would likely have to do with a country(likely after a switch in government) that requires something, going out ruthlessly to get it. The question would then be one of logistics and their actions. Can they form an army big enough to do something big enough to attract global attention? Also, are they morally wrong in some way that would create opposition in the world?

On the converse, you could argue it's impossible, given media and the sheer number of people to oppose the actions that would bring this about. Also you can argue that we're more educated as a species, and thus are less likely to go into war.

You have to make up your own mind as to which is right.

Answer 2

we are in ww3, it just appears this way because, usa,canada,uk and what ever fool country they have there. are fighting in a foriegn land. it's gonna stay this way until the end of our civilization. from now on the world will never have peace. i'm from canada. if all these countries came home, they will all carry extra baggage. because who ever the enemy is, they are waiting for another chance. to end my input, we all know what happens in a game of chess.

Answer 3

one million man or woman out of one hundred,000 that is no longer dangerous, check out travelling Glasgow City Centre after a Rangers & Celtic fit? We dont want the English we will control good enough and Well Done Rangers, you not ever gained the cup however no less than you controlled to get to the last and performed a nice recreation.

Answer 4

No because our goverment would never support it. We are losing too many in Iraq and Afganistan as it is.

Answer 5

Your teacher wants YOU to come up with answers, NOT the rest of us!