2007-03-26 04:25:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It would be a nice change of pace.
2007-03-26 04:30:13 · answer #1 · answered by Da Man 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Now think about someone asking Should Libs be allowed to talk without us seeing Al Franken's(hes the only one I know was on Air America) lips move. You would think that person was pretty stupid.
Get the point there junior?
2007-03-26 04:31:49 · answer #2 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Assuming that all neocons like what Rush says is equivalent to assuming that all liberals believe every word that Michael Moore says.
I'm a neocon, and I listen to Rush (because I like yelling at the radio and telling him he's wrong).
2007-03-26 04:34:54 · answer #3 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the huge funds backers and funders of the gop and their puppets like pretend information supply the orders. they supply the speaking factors and components to apply. Ever observed how each and each solitary republican makes use of precisely the comparable phraseology and criticisms. that is quite hysterically humorous. They in no way, ever, ever criticise their very own "tribe" yet will have exciting with utilising any complaint, actuality based or no longer, against the liberals. even in spite of the undeniable fact that that tactic is transparently hypocritcal, it is likewise accidentally hysterical. there is not any one so humorous as an boastful idealogue who fancies himself to be smart and insightful on a similar time as pointing palms everywhere yet at himself!! : D
2016-12-15 09:14:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know what you "free speech" lovers are crying about. The man makes a lot of sense and is an excellent spokesman for the Conservative point of view. If the conservative point of view is invalid, you should be able to debate without calling names and insulting people.
But we will not hold our breath. Oh and please see if you can get Sean Penn's mind out of President Bush's underpants. He is embarrassing himself.
.
2007-03-26 04:37:00 · answer #5 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You should make a deal: Yes, but only if liberals stop using the same ol' cliches that they get from the liberal media, like "war of aggression" "homophobia" "the planet" "corporate welfare" "undocumented" "tolerance" "alternative" and host of other deceptions.
2007-03-26 04:31:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you insinuating that all conservatives listen to Rush Limbaugh? We don't. I can't stand him.
2007-03-26 04:36:07 · answer #7 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To answer your question:
Yes.
To counter your question:
Should libs be allowed to talk without us seeing Olbermann's, Franken's, Stewart's, and Colbert's lips move?
2007-03-26 04:29:41 · answer #8 · answered by The Cult of Personality 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'd rather have people like Rush representing my party than people like Jane Fonda and Rosie O'Donnell.
2007-03-26 04:30:01 · answer #9 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
the people that r in place y do we continue to be deceived?
limbaugh can hardly hear let alone move his lips
2007-03-26 04:31:37 · answer #10 · answered by AlbertHoward.org 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why are libs so obsessed with Rush?
2007-03-26 04:29:44 · answer #11 · answered by chickyboom 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋