Could you explaing the following sentence, please? "?

Question

The fact that the law was not published to have a free debate to enhance its product as a result of discussions and debate that has been denied. “

Answer 1

Whatever happened to puctuation???!!!
In dissection this horrible term as follows leads to two different conclusions:
(1)law was not made public, preventying public input that would have improved the law. See sissection below:
The fact that the law was not published =a piece of the law was not made public
to have a free debate =so it could not be discussed/debated
to enhance its product = to impove its outcome
as a result of discussions and debate=because of the discussions etc
that has been denied= the improvements cant happen

(2) Law was not published for public comment (which generally improves the application of the law) and the decison not to publish came otu of some discussions etc that hav been denied (ie secret deals?).
The fact that the law was not published to have a free debate to enhance its product = wasnt published for purpose of public input
as a result of discussions and debate= reasons for not publishing came out of discussions etc
that has been denied= the discussions were denied as having happened.

Answer 2

it's worded very badly and isn't easy to understand. I think it means that the law wasn't published, so debating about it isn't allowed. it really doesn't make a lot of sense the way it's written.