Since war with Iran is inevitable what is the likely outcome for the next say 5yrs?

Question

OK the US 5th fllet is parked on thier back door
There is a British attack fleet parked beside the US fleet. It is a congested water way right now .
The Iranians have chosen to "arrest" 15 British soldiers which I think plays into the hands of the US (or at least Bush) who clearly would like to start a war with them but haven't been able to figure out how as of yet.- And here Iran hands it to them with one stupid move.Now all they have to do is pressure Britian into war and then go with them
Now don't get me wrong The abduction of 15 military men from the UK is more than a good reason
I think it will be a limited tactical nuclear strike - The Pentagon has already reclassified mini nukes as "safe" and therefore can be used in the theatere of conventional war.My question is assuming a war with Iran is just a matter of time now - How many more freedoms and liberties am I going to have to part with and what will be the consequences to our socities for the next 5 yrs or there about

Answer 1

Well, if they carpet bomb the crap out of Iran, I would see a reduction in fanatics.

Answer 2

100% sure - there will be no war with Iran. The Pentagon war hawks really want it bad, but fortunately, their puppet Bush has ceased to have power. The big budget party will be over soon for the Generals and they know it, it's just frightened desperation, they are still trying. The Democrats will take over in 2008 for 8 years and reduce the waist of the war mongering warlords, then the public will have forgotten about Iraq and be susceptible for a bloody invasion of a country far away again. It's a cycle. Maybe you get your Iran war in 2016, if China doesn't own the US, including the Pentagon by then.

Answer 3

We, the USA, would be very foolish to dive into another front. Exactly what would we be telling the world if we used "limited tactical nukes" ??
Would we be telling, say China that it would be alright to use those so called "limited tactical nukes" on Taiwan?? What would be the difference?? To use such weapons would open Pandora's box and where would it stop, if it would stop at all. While I understand that capturing those Brits was fool hearted for Iran I just cannot speculate what total war would do to the world as a whole. Five years from now we will have had a new administration for approx. 4 years. Lets hope and pray that we will be led by better minds than we are now. I must also remind you that the path that we are going now we will have to return to the draft in order to supply the amount of troops needed for continuation of the present wars not including future wars.

Answer 4

O for heaven's sake. Will you catastrophists give it up. This is a political ploy from Iran to recover their diplomats who were kidnapped by the US in Iraq. Eventually thare will be a lot of whispering behind the scenes, and then Iran will give back the Britons after they admit that they did bad, and then the US, after a decent interval, will let the Iranian diplomats go, and both sides can stop posturing.

There will not be a war with Iran, because even the Bush administration can see that this would be a complete disaster. And I mean a *huge* disaster in the whole region. A couple of mini-nukes won't take care of the Shia revolt that this would provoke.

Answer 5

Everyone needs to look at the outcome 50 years from now. Our choice is to do battle while we still have superior firepower, or do battle with an enemy who will slowly level the playing field through aid from China and Hugoland (actually they probably wouldn't "catch up" but they would get close enough to make widespread mass American civilian causalities a likelihood). Islamofascism will never stop hating us, and they will never give up their goal of imposing worldwide islamic law.

And so far, other than longer airport lines, I don't believe my freedoms have been given up (and I don't believe we are guaranteed a line-free life in the constitution). If someone at DHS is listening in to my phone calls, they are currently snoring loudly. If they choose to listen to some NYT reporter "interviewing" a terrorist, I'm all for that. Freedom of the press should not include freedom to aid and abet a sworn enemy of the United States.

Answer 6

There is no reason to assume war with Iran is inevitable. World community needs to address the Iranian issue with America, and, Iran. This is why George Bush (the Dad), was so succesful in the Iraqi war of 1990-91. W cannot take this on alone, as, we now can see how limited this approach really is.

Answer 7

Since we are running low on Military personal due to Iraq and Afghanistan we would probably end up calling up the selective service. So young people all across America will be drafted for active duty. We will pull most of our troops out of Iraq and send them to Iran and replenish Iraq with new troops from the service.

Answer 8

I doubt u . s . a . of america will stick there noses in Syria on account that there is not any longer something to thieve like oil, and in spite of if it is for a peacekeeping undertaking they won't danger sending troops because of the fact that is going to likely be yet another conflict between protection tension forces and there is not any plan for a attack. undergo in ideas they suffered somewhat in iraq. With Iran, its uncertain yet its extra achieveable on account that Iran experienced earthquakes toppling its protection tension so the people might get there hands on the oil there, in spite of if that is going to likely be heavily volatile to attack a great means even after the earthquakes undergo in ideas that they have got Russia as its best pal and it would re act extreme to this occasion because of the fact they Iran and Russia border one yet another so if a missile impacts the russian border then this may be taken as a act of conflict. And as for North Korea it won't take place Kim is making an attempt to instruct off and in the event that they're going to the two work together in a conflict which I doubt u . s . a . of america will go through extraordinarily because of the fact they wont be able to attack with missiles plenty on account that its best pal SK may be affected and neither u . s . a . of america desires to invade a usa this is waiting for them, undergo in ideas they took extreme casualties in Vietnam via a unprofessional military like viet cong yet whilst they try the Koreans they're going to combat a extreme and extensive protection tension because of the fact it has protecting positions waiting, so u . s . a . of america won't danger it.

Answer 9

Sorry buddy but there's absolutely zero chance that this abduction will start a war.