I would not mind so much if when the taxes go up 20% in the next 10 years to cover the Bush bankruptcy of america if he was sitting in jail for his actions which led to 150,000,000 people having to pay for his failed ridiculous agenda . Thousands of avoidable deaths and tens of thousands of avoidable injuries .
His plan to attack someone to get more money flowing to defense contractors really upsets me .
That he lied , that he purposely ignored information available at the time .
Like most of the hijacker's came from Saudi Arabia so why not attack them .
Any how I would not mind if Bush sat in a jail cell while millions of people worked to fix the problems that will be left for whoever inherits the White house
2007-03-26 03:26:23 · 14 answers · asked by trouble maker 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Kid, get off your eccoplex. You're only spouting the BS that your liberal idiots...I mean leaders have been shoving into your head.
We aren't going to be paying for anything. The government is, there's no bankruptcy case you have no unearthly idea of how much money this country has. We haven't even come close to dipping into the gold reserves at Fort Knox. In the 50s Fort Knox had enough gold to make a single block 144 feet X 144 feet square. Do you have the slightest inkling of how much that gold is worth and now it's 50 years latter and it has grown bigger in that 50 years.
You're just blowing steam you liberal parrot. You really have no idea of what you're talking about.
2007-03-26 03:51:24 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you know much about history you would also know that in WWII the country was also bankrupt and had to sale war bonds to get the money needed to keep the war effort going. The people of the country were not really behind the war effort anymore and were just wanting the troops to come home. War cost money and just because we people sitting at home and not risking our lives get tired of the war it doesn't mean the war is wrong. If we had just pulled our troops out of WWII when the people tired of it we would be speaking Japanese or German now. The only place where Bush has failed to fullfill his duty is the illegal immigration. If Bush is guilty of any offense that we could get him out of office for the Dems would have allready done it.
2007-03-26 03:38:32 · answer #2 · answered by joevette 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is no surprise that a liberal like yourself would have no objection to higher taxes...when did you people ever see a tax hike you didn't like?.
As for the 'Bush' debt, perhaps a reality check is in order.
The US CONGRESS appropriates funds - not the President.
His 'plan to attack someone to get more money to defence contractors...'
PUH-LEEEZE . Can you substantiate that foolishness with a single example?
Of course not.
We are at war...in times of war military spending rises.
Put down the kool-aid and spend just 20 seconds thinking clearly...then you won't post this kind of mindless nonsense.
You are a seriously ill-informed individual.
Educate yourself before attempting to engage adults in political debate again...you are embarrassing yourself.
2007-03-26 03:37:50 · answer #3 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
it is the grasp plan my pal. Hyperinflation is the planned answer for that pesky Social secure practices legal accountability. it is going to slot in genuine properly with all and sundry of those under priced homes too. i contemplate whether they used those great-desktops to return up with this application. i think of it extremely is a few Machiavellian devised answer for plenty of issues. What you do no longer % to do is carry any paper sources like money, bonds and T-expenses which at the instant are not extremely listed to an "straightforward" inflation value.
2016-10-20 11:48:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you think it is only America that is bankrupt?
Our government debt as a percentage of GDP in around 40%, compared to 50%+ across Europe and 80%+ in Japan.
The rest of your question is ignorance in pure form and doesn't deserve comment.
2007-03-26 03:30:39 · answer #5 · answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Send everyone who voted to go to war in jail with him. He alone did not send our troops to war. Congress did too.
2007-03-26 03:39:48 · answer #6 · answered by Reported for insulting my belief 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You seem to forget - congress voted for this war also. President Bush has not committed any crime - therefore - NO IMPEACHMENT - get the picture?
2007-03-26 03:35:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
He'll be an oil baron like his daddy when he retires and take frequent trips to that lovely country of Saudi Arabia where they behead women for adultery in a public forum.
2007-03-26 03:29:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Blah blah blah.........Libtard crap. Are you prepared to say the same about Nixon? FDR? Wilson? Virtually every Prez that's been in office and sent our troops into harm's way? I doubt it. So forget about it.
2007-03-26 03:31:58 · answer #9 · answered by Beachman 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
i am from the uk and i'd happily chuck you some dollars to help your debt, to see bush get his just deserts.
unfortunately, tho, our "fine" priminister has decided bush was right and we are in debt also. blair also ignored intellegance about WMD, and infact the wepons expert that advised blair was foun misteriously dead when the documents were leaked!! so, blair and bush should seriously be held accountable...they are not above the law, surely?
2007-03-26 03:32:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋