Why would Ann Coulter refer to John Edwards as being a ****** ?

Question

SO .. she says it was a joke ..... which it was ... in her Howard Stern shock jocklike kinda way.

But its it spose to mean that Edwards is feminine ... a wuss .... gay ? Do you think she feels some remorse for making the statement because of his wife's cancer or because of some media fallout ? Or is she just a cold, crass, calculating manly with long blond hair stickpin ?

Is it good to be mean back or does that just fan the flames ???

By the way ..... the ****** I guess was the word blocked by Yahoo but the word ... if you don't know .. is fa*got ....

Answer 1

I doubt she feels remorse. Ann Coulter is just an annoying person who trades on being outrageous as well as being far right. I'm conservative myself, but I can't stand HER.

I think it does just fan the flames to be mean back. Let's raise the level of discourse. Name calling doesn't do any good.

Answer 2

All political events disparage one yet another in the consistent conflict to maintain or maintain power in Washington. Ann Coulter has each and every desirable as an American citizen to communicate her recommendations approximately regardless of she feels. She is yet yet another casualty in our movie star-obsessed way of life, the place “desirous to be in demand” seems to be an ambition of extreme regard in usa of america. specific, she’s outspoken, yet she’s not the only individual in the media section that's. the only distinction is she seems to have political tourette’s syndrome – she will’t help herself whilst she opens her mouth. She’ll do something and each thing to maintain her call in the press, regardless of if her words carry the ethical floor or not. She’s a humiliation to herself and the Republican occasion with which she aligns herself. She did not certainly call John Edwards a ‘F****t”, however the inference grew to become into purely a similar. She used a observe that's negatively used to describe gays & lesbians. And as an aside, she claims she is inquisitive approximately gay rights, yet you may not use defaming words against a team of persons you declare would desire to have equivalent rights, yet pass away them preserving the burden of inequality. i think of “the lady doth protest too lots.” Ann Coulter does not care with reference to the Republican occasion; she does not care with reference to the Democratic occasion. the only occasion she truly cares approximately is the Ann Coulter occasion.