Should we depend on the child bearing numbers of third world countries to sustain the future of Western world?

Question

...........countries?

(tobcal: it's pretty straitforward,
being as there are many below 0 population growth countries in the West,
I want to know if people think any western country should depend on immigration of those from the third world who ARE having many children)...
'
it's much easier if you just answer the question and try to ignore the reason behind the question.

Answer 1

It won't be "western" anymore, just as a tree infested with an uncontrolled population of termites is not a tree for very long. What we need to do is call an exterminator.

We also need to stop the culture of liberalism, which sees child bearing as a disease to be eliminated.

Answer 2

What exactly are you asking? Are you saying that the answer to some of europes declining birth rates is to import babies, or child bearing women into those countries to maintain population levels?

Then no, we shouldn't depend on third world countries to sustain our future.

Answer 3

No! Our population figures our fine, our birth rates are also fine. The population of America is stable, which is the way it's supposed to be and the way it has been for millenia until the advent of agriculture, and after that technology that decreased infant mortality and stretched lifespans worldwide. All of the world needs to get to such a point.

Answer 4

It isn't a matter of should we, we already do. With the cost of birthing and raising a child in most western nations many families simply cannot afford to have more than one or two children.

Answer 5

Maybe the future is nither western or eastern.......Does that concept scare individuals: Maybe they should ask themselves why they fear such a future and wether the survival of one hemisphere, race or indeed species is more important than the others.