does anyone believe the face on mars is a artifiacial depiction of a human face?

Question

the cydonia region of mars has gotten a lot of attention over the years and admittedly it does resemble a face but is it real, and does that prove we are not alone. and how might our philosophy of life change if/when we discover we are in fact not alone

IF nasa was covering up why would you turn to them for the truth, just a thought, face it, we don't know everything and it's possible

Answer 1

The Face on Mars is still debated still because NASA and the ESA have taken radicaly different pictures of the area leading many to believe that indeed something is being covered up. There is also an amazing find by a guy named Adam Marturana that shows how the Cydonia region on Mars fits into a Golden Ratio which is an extremly good measure for testing artificiality. You can see his web site here: http://www.aadm.com/cydonia/Cydonia.htm or the home page here: http://www.aadm.com/cydonia . The guy is clearly some kind of visionary genous.

Answer 2

The mountain shadow on Mars by pure chance looks a little like a human face.

Anyone who believes this was artificially done should consider the odds that a martian would have any clue as to what an earthly human face would look like.

If we ever do discover alien life forms with advanced intelligence, it won't be on Mars.

Answer 3

There are lots of folks who believe that. They also believe that Americans have never landed on the moon, that Elvis is still alive and working at a donut shop in Cleveland, that the earth is flat, and that the sun revolves around the earth.

The original photos of the "face" incorporated some digital transmission errors that put black spots in strategic places, and people looked at them and made patterns that weren't there, thus it became a face.

More recent photos of the Cydonia site have shown conclusively that the "face" is nothing of the sort.

Answer 4

Face is the area that concerns because of the fact it rather is the area you especially ought to handle all day- an everyday physique might suffice. I look to take excitement in a good physique too, yet especially in a "yeah i might shag her" kinda way. Face continues to be what particularly counts once you're thinking of a few thing extreme. inspite of the undeniable fact that, a under everyday physique is on no account good. One's defecit is made up for by way of character at that element. An unattractive physique could be somebody who's rather out of shape, disproportionate, has undesirable epidermis, etc. i don't provide extreme precedence to boobs or butts, even nevertheless the two or the two are good (ideally the latter in my own opinion lol)

Answer 5

I've seen the rock formation from other angles and it does not resemble a human face. I think it's just a coincidence. I'm not saying I don't believe in other life forms on other planets, just that I don't believe that the 'face' was made by an intelligent species. I think it's kind of arrogant to believe that in a universe that goes on forever we're the only form of life there is.

Answer 6

It hardly even looks like a face, especially when the lighting is not perfectly aligned. The thing about humans is that psychologically we are always attuned to finding face-like patterns in things. The man in the moon, for example. As babies we learn to think this way when we look for our parent's faces.

These face-on-mars buffoons do make me laugh though.

Answer 7

It's just a hilly formation and the shadows caught it the right way on that day to look like a monkey face.

Answer 8

I'm still amazed that thiw was debunked about 6 years ago, and people still ask about it

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_60.html

Answer 9

No it is just like the man in the moon or the Bunny on the moon to me.

Answer 10

A martian wouldn't even know what we looked like.