English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There are no bigger porkers then Republicans.

According to a Congressional Research Service study, the number of earmarks in spending, or appropriations, bills went from 4,126 in 1994 to 15,877 in 2005. The value of those earmarks doubled to $47.4 billion in the same period. Earmarked projects often include roads, bridges and economic development efforts.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2767546&page=3

2007-03-26 02:15:49 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

2 answers

I believe that Republicans are criticizing the Democrats for putting so much pork into the Dems bill which they claim would end the war. The criticism was not about whether or not they should use pork. It was that they were using the pork to try and win votes against the war.

2007-03-26 05:05:32 · answer #1 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0 0

Republicans have decreased just about all of political rhetoric to an undemanding formulation: Our occasion: good, the different occasion: undesirable. it rather is not considerable how good or undesirable an theory is, if it particularly is a 'Democrat' theory, it particularly is a foul theory. If a toddler-kisser lies or breaks supplies you, if he's Republican then it rather is nice, he replaced into justified, he replaced into compelled into it, if he's a Democrat he's a criminal and a liar and a communist. it rather is particularly in order that basic as that. For 30 years now Republicans have strongly promised in campaigns to make balancing the cost variety their first precedence. yet as quickly as elected they have behaved as though debt in basic terms did not count. they have consistently blamed the 'Democrat occasion' for their own failure to grant on supplies you. the only way you will get people to persist with you for 30 years of consistently broken supplies you is to make it completely a partisan situation. there is an old adage approximately propaganda, i know Goebbels is given credit for it yet i think of it is going previously previous him, that in case you repeat a lie sufficient cases it turns into the certainty. So for all this time the Republicans have used good rhetoric to affiliate Democrats with 'tax and spend', 'beef', corruption and graft, etc. they have equipped an entire media empire, newspapers, radio, television, etc., to repeat this lie lower back and lower back so listeners can repeat the slogans of their sleep. it is an identical way Sesame highway works--p.c.. 2 or 3 'memes' and repeat them repeatedly for 0.5 an hour, topersistent them into the minds of your listeners. the great irony of the final 30 years is that the only president who unquestionably made good on the perennial Republican promise to cut back government., cut back spending, cut back deficits, placed us heading in the right direction in the direction of a balanced finances and provide a tax cut back to the midsection type replaced right into a Democrat! How strange is it that Republican voters, who insist that's what they desire, might fairly vote for Republicans who on no account grant on their supplies you than a Democrat who supplies them precisely what they needed?

2016-10-19 23:02:49 · answer #2 · answered by dusik 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers