How can we count on Hillary to take care of our country when she couldn´t even take care of her Husbands "basic" needs?
Solving a man´s need for "satisfaction" is not exacltly has difficult as balancing the budget or immigration reforms or especially the situation in the middle east.
If Hillary obviosly couldn´t do that how is will she run the country?
2007-03-26 00:53:23 · 11 answers · asked by James R 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is not meant as a deep question, if she can´t take care of her man, how´s she gonna take care of the country...
2007-03-26 01:19:18 · update #1
Everyone is so excited because she would be the first female president, but as anyone done any research on her? You can't go on her word. I am not going to get into details, but her records as a senator are less than great.
2007-03-26 01:00:32 · answer #1 · answered by uc0nnh00ps 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
i imagine human beings interior the South are warming as a lot as Rudy because he's the alternative to Hillary Clinton and is taken under consideration because the candidate who can defeat her by technique of bringing sensible Democrats into his camp. maximum pink states could vote for Rudy over Hillary and if he could convey some blue states over he can win. a nil.33 celebration candidate could reason issues for between the applicants searching on the position they stand. bill Clinton beat George Bush because of Perot. George W. Bush beat Gore because of Nader. If someone like Ron Paul runs as a third celebration candidate, he will surely provide the election to Hillary.
2016-12-02 20:14:14 · answer #2 · answered by sarro 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary can lead just fine. The issue is whether we want her to.
I am not a fan of Hillary Clinton, but I find it ridiculous to blame her for her husband's philandering.
Conservatives who claim to believe in "personal responsibility" have no business putting a man's sexual fidelity on the shoulders of his wife.
2007-03-26 00:58:04 · answer #3 · answered by Shrink 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She can lead us into the poor house making 20% of Americans dependent on the government and blame it on Bush.
2007-03-26 01:13:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think the two issues are separate, Hillary is a Strong, very intelligent woman and I believe she is a leader. I don't think it is a re-vote for Bill, it is a vote for Hillary.
2007-03-26 01:01:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
She managed to lead Vince Foster off the edge of the cliff.
2007-03-26 00:56:59 · answer #6 · answered by Lynn G 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't worry about Hillary, she can accomplish all you have mentioned, including Bill. Bill of course is none of our business.
2007-03-27 17:45:03 · answer #7 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
SHE COULDN'T LEAD HER WAY OUT OF PAPER BAG. SHE IS THE MOST OVERRATED POLITICIAN. SHE HAS NO RECORD OF ACHIEVEMENT IN THE SENATE. I THINK THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK WERE FOOLISH TO RE ELECT THIS WOMAN TO THE SENATE.
AS FAR AS SATISFYING BILL SHE PROBABLY NEVER DID.
2007-03-26 02:06:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I doubt any of our former presidents could satisfy Bill Clinton's basic needs...
2007-03-26 01:04:28 · answer #9 · answered by eli 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
she won't lead, but rather PUSH like the perverbial bull in a china shop!
2007-03-26 01:31:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋