English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the indians cant play with any big team.

2007-03-24 20:54:55 · 18 answers · asked by mujahed 2 in Sports Cricket

18 answers

team india did not play as unit ganguly and his supportes are main culprits played negative cricket and played big role in defeat of team ind. A captain is as good as his teammates failure of dhoni, sachin, gangulys selfish negative cricket, herbjan went wktless in both games. Poor fielding, poor running between wkts. lack of application, commitment for team by players was visible in all three matches. some players were not supporting captain.If bowlers gave 27 extra runs and poor fielding, and ind bataman failed in imp match why should onlycaptain but all XI players should be blamed.?SL scored 113 runs in singles but team played only 43 overs and 106 dot ball
Winning or defeat in matches depends on performance of XI players. Irrespective of captain, coach, pitch, stretagy and conditions. Bangladesh and SL victory against India is best example. main culprit is ganguly amd harbajan tendulaakr and dhoni who played big role in defeat against Bangladesh
What about contribtuion of ganguly to team defeat. First match only he played the negative cricket,scored more runs for self to finish 1000 runs in WC and played main role in defeat against banladesh.
On the day of Shri Lanka match there was SMS from Journalist to Ganguly. (TOI report) Whole team is responsible for defeat( if team wins everybody comes to forward to claim the credit) Winning or defeat in matches depends on performance of XI players. Irrespective of captain, coach, pitch, stretagy and conditions. Bangladesh and SL victory against India is best example
ganguly wasted more balls than dravid faced
66 runs out of 133 balls
89 in 114 balls 7 runs in 29 balls
India Scored 191 in 50 overs
Ganguly Scored 66 runs in 21 overs wasted more balls than runs he scored.,
Yuvraj Scored 47 runs in 10 overs
Rest of team scored 50 in 19 overs
Against burmada he scored 89 in 114 balls wasted 25 balls that is around 4.6 runs per over... compare it to the indian teams average of 8.26 Ganguly was struggling while batting against burmuda, and got 3 lifes
ganguly played a big role in india's defeat against bangladesh and main culprit for sabotage ind team WC campaingnganguly sruvived so in captaincy b'cuz dalmiay his godfather his success is not b'zuc of agression or leadership quality but from the contributions of dravid laxman kumble, sachin and sewag
On the day of Shri Lanka match there was SMS from Journalist to Ganguly. (TOI report)



On background of Ganguly's slow innings against Bangla desh.This saw Indian defeat against Bangladesh as remaining 6 batsman were left with 36 balls to score.
Can some body throw light on that SMS. The way chappell emil msg published in bangali paper

This lobby of Ganguly and Bengal journalists put pressure on team just to help ganguly sabotage indian campaign.

Even match against South Africa at Eden Gardens all Bengali crowd supported SA team.

dravid did a good job but he has no godfather in bcci or political support.. the match against bangladesh and SL was visible that players were not supporting captain though media is unfair to captiancy or batsmanship, stat prove that he is better odi wininng average than any other captain. ganguly had godfather dalmiay and tendulkar has the pawar and vengasarkar

.

2007-03-24 21:08:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It is not correct to say that India cannot play with any big team as the same players have defeated Sri Lanka and West Indies in ODI series played in India just before the world cup. However, in the matches against Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, Indian players played very poorly and lost the matches.

2007-03-25 17:24:56 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

Ind vs bangladesh........India was a better side regarding their talent and experience but they were lacking the dedication and they underestimated the Bangla team who played with real dedication and put their all effert in that game proving that talent and expereince is not everything but it needs hard work and dedication as well!

India vs srilanka.......so talentwise, not much difference .but again Inida was lacking the planning and dedication plus Kumble was missing , Even the older player Murali fielded so well while here even the youngster didn't care much and didn't put their effert.......Indians are taken to be the best to play the spin bowling and Murali the spinner was the person who brought the destruction for their batting line .....if just looking at the Indian batting line, Ganguly, Dravid, Sehwag, Tandulker, Dhoni........Big names man !!...........and they could not chase 255 runs even....this was not a safe score but the players didn't try to get it actualy !

With all that India was lacking the 'Planning' and for that indians should be thankful to Sir Greg Chappel !

2007-03-24 23:04:36 · answer #3 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0 0

There is no difference between India vs Bangladesh and Srilanka Both are matches India lost. We are only heroes in our home, and rats out side. There is no aggression and determination. If we shown this would have won both. The only one difference is that India vs Srilanka match was our ticket back home without any need to bother for WC 2007.

2007-03-24 21:03:44 · answer #4 · answered by PT B 2 · 1 1

No difference in both the defeat but the similarity is that the Indians lost to both lankans and Banglas..

2007-03-24 22:02:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i will tell the similarity b/n them....
we lost both the matches!!!!!

this means, we cannt play with small teams n big teams too

2007-03-24 21:50:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the difference is that in the match wid bangla india was overconfident n were not in full strength whereas wid lanka india were under pressure and in ful strength

2007-03-24 21:26:49 · answer #7 · answered by k j 1 · 0 0

as for the oppns. it is treat for them. for indians they take it as a duty. go to the ground do something enjoy and comeback that is it. no difference.

2007-03-24 21:40:32 · answer #8 · answered by gansatanswers 3 · 0 0

you almost tell the answer for your own question...
Also there are lots of mistakes in Indian team.....

2007-03-24 21:18:47 · answer #9 · answered by tdapower 3 · 0 0

difference is only that the teams were changed.and both teams play in there style and won.but India play both matches like fool....................

2007-03-24 21:10:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

ind vs ban over confidence
ind vs sl lack of confidence

2007-03-25 01:27:48 · answer #11 · answered by mayur.nandode 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers