only a matter of time -
This is all fact - two U.S. carrier attack groups have been deployed to the Persian Gulf. U.S.
missile systems are being sent to oil producing countries to counter any incoming missiles from Iran should any survive the U.S. attack. Israeli pilots have been training for an attack on Iran. U.S. war doctrine has been changed to permit pre-emptive nuclear attack on non-nuclear countries. U.S. attack aircraft have been deployed at bases in Turkey. An admiral who attends A.I.P.A.C. events has been made commander in chief of U.S. forces in the Middle
East. Obviously, the ground war in Iraq and Afghanistan are not the focus of the Bush Regimes new military deployments. The Bush Regime is fully focused on attacking Iran.
2007-03-24 21:06:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not from our side first anyway. Iran, who knows, they may try to fire one at us, but we stand a very good chance of shooting it down. We have the capability to meet any attack with out using nuclear weapons. It's not likely that they would try for a long range weapon attack. The longer it's in the air the better chance we have of intercepting it. No, I think that it would be a short range target. They would target our forces in the region, But even that would be rather difficult. As all eyes are on them right now. Russia and China have a vested interest in Iran not using nuclear power in that fashon. Both would stand to loose a great deal of legitimacy. They both helped Iran get it's nuclear program where it is today. And would share the blame for Iran using that program to make weapons. That is why the Russians have taken the stance they have with Iran. So we wait and see . And remain ever vigilant.
2007-03-25 04:02:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gunny 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is this political negative propaganda that calls for war .Create peace through economic ties instead of asking for a nuclear war with iran .Feed the people and they shall come understand.
2007-03-25 04:02:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What is it with you people anyway? Is wiping out other countries with nukes all you can think of???
Or is it because you can't fight fair anymore? I mean, given the fact that Bush had called for use of tactical nukes against Iraq before the invasion, and his supporters wanting to turn that country into a 'glass desert'...?
It's just sad that in this day and age, people are still consumed with hatred, bigotry, and wanton destruction of other nations without pretense.
2007-03-25 04:10:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Good idea.
America fires its Nukes at Iran while Iran fires its Nukes at Israel.
Both countries wiped off the map and the entire world will celebrate.
2007-03-25 03:34:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by TonyB 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Very small tactical ones if at all and only against the Iranian nuclear research, technology sites.
The hardened bunker type.
Conventional bombing should do the rest.
Land invasion, or seaborne attack would be suicide.
How many allies the US would have i don't know.
Lets just hope the sanctions work!
2007-03-25 04:35:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by oldster 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Won't happen. the president of Iran knows deep down that if he attacks America or one of our allies, he'll at the very least have a whole lot of military force coming his way.
2007-03-25 03:34:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
We should vote on nuking all he bastards that are causing themselves and the rest of the world pain and sorrow. Maybe God will understand that it's the only way to deal with that and to have peace on his created earth. Good enough, yes?
2007-03-25 04:03:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by FILO 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
retarded in every way. They do not need courage because they are not aware of it when their leaders launch nukes so all you need is one crazy guy in charge which they have. They would go suicide on us and the whole of america cries when only one guy dies in the army.
2007-03-25 03:29:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it’s just a chord war. No one attacks the other .but policy does more conflicts. Suspense and tension.
2007-03-25 03:55:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Johny 2
·
0⤊
0⤋