I would rather be eaten by vultures and have my eyes torn out by the buzzards. My answer is no. Long live morality. Like that answer?
2007-03-24 20:11:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Bashing Republicans is easy its true, and of course popular. But it is also safe.
Unfortunately for the Republicans, Hillary is a little smarter than the average American.
Why does America fail in so many parts of the world? Frequently it's due to expecting the enemy to "Step out in the open and fight like a man". Then being surprised when the enemy doesn't play by the rules that lean heavily in favour of the USA (Why suicide bombers have been successful)
Hillary cannot benefit by sticking her head up to get shot down by her enemies. Half of politics is not what you do, but what stupid things you didn't do. It's early yet, she may not be running anyway, Obama is looking good
2007-03-25 03:35:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. This country is not ready to have a woman as it's leader.
2. If this country were ready to have a woman as it's leader, Hillary Clinton would NOT be that woman.
3. The Democrats are either stupid or arrogant to think Clinton is a viable option to make a run the White House.
Obama is too inexperienced to effectively handle the s*^t stew that has become our foreign policy for the past 6 years and Giuliani is an underqualified hack who has leveraged one of the most painful events in this country's history for his own political gain. His unseemly posturing aside, let's not forget that he was about to be unceremoniously bounced from office before 9/11.
Pardon the tangent. To answer your question, no, I cannot see myself supporting a Hillary presidency.
2007-03-25 04:45:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by zapcity29 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, I heard the most ridiculous comment from a caller to C-Span this morning. She stated 'she wanted to vote for Hillary because she is a women and that would make her more compassionate;. She further said that she can't afford to drive due to gas prices and besides the roads are sooo bad and everyone should have free health care. She feels Hillary will change all this. Ironically, she lives in N.Y. Go figure.
2007-03-25 09:46:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Heidi 4 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. She can't emerge from the shadow of her husband, mainly because she hasn't tried. She can do more than bash republicans. She attacked Obama for a statement David Geffen made. And let's not forget her terrible fake southern accent, and comparing her running for president to the oppression that African Americans unfortunately had to endure.
And don't forget that she's the first female, southern, Jewish, black, Catholic to run for President. That seems to be what she wants people to think, anyway.
2007-03-25 03:22:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton is self-serving and power hungry. But, she has no absolute vision for the nation. She sways with the breeze to garner votes and that's hardly the type of person we need in the White House.
2007-03-25 03:12:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by goaltender 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
No, I wouldnt vote for Mrs. "It was the hardest decision I ever had to make" All that does is show she wouldnt finish things through, cus now she is screaming for a pull out.
GIULIANI IN 08!!!!
2007-03-25 03:09:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by cliffburtongodofthebass 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
You said it for me. No, I would not vote for Hillary even if she were the only one on the balot.
2007-03-25 03:34:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No. I think I'll be voting Independent this coming election.
Neither party has candidates I'm terribly hard up over.
2007-03-25 04:34:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
There is no one out there that I wouldn't vote for before I would vote for her. So the answer is :Never,Never, Never!
2007-03-25 03:23:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋