It appears many people understand that these "scandals" are mostly trivial things being elevated to a national interest by a Democratic Congress that is powerless to actually DO anything (since they can't overide veto's). Can they keep this up all the way to the 2008 election? If we see it, doesn't everyone? And, if so, won't it negate the effect since the country is so evenly split between Conservatives and Liberals?
2007-03-24
18:22:09
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Chi: I hardly think a rational arguement could be made for blaming veteran care on Bush alone. Veteran care has been a low national priority for 40 years. Not that I agree with that, but horrible VA facilities are nothing new, in example. So it falls in the hyperbolic scandal file, I think.
On the flip side, I'm very glad it has national attention now, and I hope this ends decades of neglect;-)
2007-03-24
18:30:23 ·
update #1
Libby was convicted of lying, not exposing Valerie Plame, of course. Lying isn't a scandal, on such a trivial issue, by my way of thinking. But hey, that's me.
2007-03-24
18:32:21 ·
update #2
Chi: Don't you think I'd make a better spin control guy than who they've got though? ;-)
2007-03-24
18:35:44 ·
update #3
g: Good retort, and good point. One could easily say the Democrats are doing what they can, and it is indeed Bush shattering their dreams. However, that is always how it has worked. The two branches must be partners. The legislative must send bills the excutive can live with.
Bush has vetoed less legislation than any President in the last 50 years, I think he's been quite fair, indeed.
2007-03-24
19:02:16 ·
update #4
g: Also, spin needn't change the opinion of any current Democrat, which, I assume, you are (If incoreect, my appologies). How things are perceived only matters to the swing voters, who now control this country. This question was about how swing voters will perceive all these scandals. Will they see them as a procession of legitimate qualms, or the result of a powerless Congress with two much time on their hands, and an election approaching?
2007-03-24
19:07:53 ·
update #5