2007-03-24 17:28:14 · 26 answers · asked by mr.bill 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She wouldn't be if she met me!
2007-03-24 17:30:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
Her history suggests that, from her days at Radcliffe until she married Clinton she was champion on women's rights. In a time when it wasn't not fashionable.
Through out their careers she appears not to be concerned with Bills peccadilloes, Unfortunately she demanded that Paula Jones vs Clinton go to trial, against the advisers request.
Lets just say they relationship is not Ozzie and Harriet with Rick and Dave running around..
2007-03-25 00:51:39 · answer #2 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That's what Cons say about ANY woman who is intelligent, outspoken, progressive, educated and beating the living dogcrap out of them in every intellectual argument! That would qualify in the case of Ann Coulter except for her Adam's apple, her huge hands and huge feet and her hairy legs... and the fact that she pees standing up! But... Hillary...? Nahhhhh....! She carries Slick Willy's testicles in her purse!
EDITED: Eric6453, You mean like Mark Foley and Ted Haggard? Or that transvestite Ann Coulter, passing off as a woman with those large hands, large feet, huge Adam's apple and fairly legs...? Ann Coulter is such a turn-off that he-she can make a crowbar go limp! At least Slick Willy got his b-j from a WOMAN; it upsets the Repubs that Monica was a woman (or maybe the Repubs were just jeolous of Monica...?)
2007-03-25 00:33:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
That is a terrible question to pose without any facts to substantiate the question.
2007-03-27 14:53:57 · answer #4 · answered by rp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shhhhhh!!!
She's saving it to leak out at the last minute to persuade the homosexuals to vote for her!
You'll screw over her timing and the Republicans will have PROOF before the election!
2007-03-25 00:32:31 · answer #5 · answered by Deathbunny 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Thats her pesonal business. If she chose to make it public the she would. Otherwise I wouldn't srpead rumours I don't know to be true as factual.
2007-03-25 00:40:29 · answer #6 · answered by Edward J 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Why, are you interested? Or is a woman in your family intersted in her?
2007-03-25 13:53:33 · answer #7 · answered by cynical 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is whatever will get her closer to the crown.
The woman is a man in a pink suit.
She is no one I would want my children near.
She and Bill are two of the worst thieves in history.
2007-03-25 00:32:07 · answer #8 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 6⤊ 4⤋
You're just trying to start some ridiculous rumor.
2007-03-25 00:43:48 · answer #9 · answered by cartiphilus 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Have you been talking to my brother in law?
2007-03-25 00:31:10 · answer #10 · answered by sandra b 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
She never looks happy to me. I think she is actually quite unhappy.
I think, based on her constant attacks on men, and her lengthy tirades about how women are victims of men, yes. She is gay. A Rosie O'Donnell queer, a man-hater.
2007-03-25 00:38:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋