Okay, after a serious and intense process of contemplation I've come to a few conclusions:
a) If we live in a world of free will, there is no God. Free will + actions = accountability for these actions. Therefore if God DID commit the act of creating us, he'd be responsible for us and, respectively, our actions; uplifting all accountability we would otherwise have for said actions. This is a complete objection and contradiction any purpose/meaning we uphold for ourselves, creating a world of nihilism. Thus, God can't exist in such a world.
b) A world of fate requires a God to sustain its structure. A deterministic perception of reality would call for all causes and their respected effects to be apart of a long, on-going chain of such causes and effects, leading all the way back to one initial cause: God.
So I ask you, which paradigm do you adhere to: a or b?
2007-03-24
17:20:51
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Smokey
2
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy