It depends on what you consider a "developed" country..if you're talking about cultural and spiritual contributions, I'd say the Asian countries that have been around for centuries are much more developed than the US or Canada, or even Europe.
Many of the most sophisticated and highly developed civilizations that pre-dated the US or Canada, have been in Africa, the Middle East, and Central and South America.
It's very confining to limit "development" to financial gains or to a specific race or color. Fortunes can fall very quickly. Many races and cultures have endured for centuries; the US and Canada are very young nations. It will take time to discover if the US or Canada make a lasting impact on the world, over more than a couple centuries.
2007-03-24 17:43:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by edith clarke 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
developed one million. Europe in part developed. one million.A. North us of a, Australia/Oceania UNDERDEVELOPED 2. Africa, Asia, South us of a. I evaluate North us of a in part developed because of critical american countries and the few Caribbean countries underdeveloped. Mexico is a sort of world places that would desire to fall under the two type. the U. S. and Canada are the only confident shot developed countries. as a techniques because of fact the Australian Continent, I view it an identical way. Australia and New Zealand are developed yet in basic terms some pacific island countries are "developed" whilst maximum at the instant are not. i might evaluate those continents frequently developed because of fact the international places I named take up lots of the area yet some might disagree.
2016-10-20 09:51:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by grauer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
why is it that only developed countries have practiced the worst and most inhumane forms of slavery and/or exploitation for gain as oppose to undeveloped countries. It's just a different type of trade off. Let's just hope evolution will weed out these types of questions...
2007-03-24 18:02:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by BT 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
What? im being honest, since when is your definition of "developed" a good thing? In my opinion id rather live in jamaica anyday, true its not as "developed" in your standards, buts its beautiful, and I wont have to say "supersize me" like we do in white-run countries.
2007-03-25 13:45:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Europe is and Canada is, but I'm not too sure about America. Here, we try to run away from the fighting and there they aren't afraid of a fight. I admire them for that.
2007-03-24 17:18:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by lalalalalala 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
One word - Ethiopia. Most beautiful people in the world... one of the most beautiful and well developed countries as well. Even a pale-hearted bigot like yourself could see that if you were to open your eyes and get your head out of your asshole.
2007-03-24 17:57:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by This Is Me Being Grumpy 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
actully south africa is very developed and japnesse people are yellow and are draker than whites but are very developed so is singapore
2007-03-25 00:11:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by canadian 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Do you really believe Japan, China and Eastern Russia are undeveloped.
2007-03-24 17:09:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Terry 7
·
10⤊
1⤋
interesting question but i havent figured that out..If you come up with a sensible answer to that, let me know... :))
2007-03-24 17:12:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kuting 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
people are arrases that is why
2007-03-24 17:08:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋