come on republicans
IRAQ is a CIVL WAR, get a clue
2007-03-24 16:37:16 · 11 answers · asked by DumbsField o 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
republican couldn't find a clue if it was stapled to their forehead.
2007-03-24 16:40:21 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
They had their part in it but the Media which is an extension of the Democrat party had its part. I would not want full state censorship of the press but I don't care for a completely free press either in light of the last few years. I guess I am starting to see what A. Einstein, Ben Franklin were talking about when they bashed the free press. yes I am bargaining to think its time to bring back the Allien and Sedition Act After all what is going on with the press is an act of sedition and I would go so far as to call it treasonous.
2007-03-24 17:05:52 · answer #2 · answered by sean e 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is NOT a civil war. It is being fought by insurgents, in other words people from foreign countries.
If it is a civil war, why are the Kurds at peace and the south has no fighting going on. In fact it is so quiet that half the British men are going home.
2007-03-24 16:43:00 · answer #3 · answered by Kye H 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First the be conscious "repuke is derogatory and insulting. It violates the Yahoo words of service. you will possibly be able to as properly be calling a black guy or woman with the help of a racist ephitet. 2nd... the wars are not somewhat failing, the media is in order that liberal-biased that they in no way report any valuable progression. We walked into Iraq and crushed their defense force. Squashed it like it did no longer even exist. it extremely is named prevailing a war. We have been welcomed like conquering heros... because of fact we've been. we've had substantial progression in rebuilding. extra homes in Iraq have good electric powered service than ever in the previous interior the rustic's history. Iraq has had valuable elections. They voted in intervening time management who drafted a clean shape which grew to become into authorized with the help of the Iraqi human beings, then they voted of their representative government leaders. Their colleges are open and extra little ones are transforming into knowledgeable than in the previous the war... The war is definitely over.. we are interior the profession section... its what winners do in the event that they do no longer % the conquered us of a to fall into chaos you % clueless... look interior the replicate.
2016-10-20 09:50:39 · answer #4 · answered by grauer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq was an invasion that started a civil war.
An invasion that violated international treaties.
Treaties that our nation helped to define/implement.
Until now ofcourse.
2007-03-25 04:30:29 · answer #5 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it was Bush's handling of the war and his idiot advisers!
Not to mention his stupid reason for going to war!
All lies!
2007-03-24 16:48:58 · answer #6 · answered by oldster 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush caused his wars to fail with his own inadequacy's,, he has nobody else to blame but himself,, accountability or responsibility are not part of his plan,,,,
2007-03-24 16:44:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
On the one hand, they'll say things are going great in Iraq. On the other, they tell liberals that the reason we're failing is because liberals "want" us to fail.
Let me tell you something, if liberals could make things happen just by "wanting" them, Bush wouldn't be in office any more.
2007-03-24 16:40:58 · answer #8 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
America hasn't LOST any war. We are losing the peace, however.
2007-03-24 16:41:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, the war was a failure well before the protesters started doing their thing.
2007-03-24 16:40:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋