Most of the kings that were feared were also hated. Most of these died sooner than they would have desired. If you love your king you want to follow him and protect him. Of course if you love him but he's an idiot he too could see his maker sooner than necessary.
2007-03-24 15:56:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by letaican 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mostly people work best with love. But some are so stupid they can only be governed by fear. So I would say a king needs to be loved by the multitude and feared by a minority. Ultimately a king rules by consent, through insight beyond common opinion, and persuasion. That requires that he (or she) is percieved as truly caring for his people, and trusted for his integrity, wisdom, and justice. My grandfather, teaching "the lessons of the king" from generations of tribal leadership, taught me that the true king is a dead man - though he must be more aware than most, and passionate when appropriate. He belongs to his people, has put personal gain of all kinds beyond him, so though he may be fed sweets and honey in return for taking responsibility wisely, he knows he has nothing to lose even in death. He must be able to act resolutely, without the certainty of dogma, knowing the illusion of past and existing beliefs may be dangerous delusions. That will keep him alert, honest, brave, and compassionate; and knowing less wise folk are driven primarily by self-interest (here or in the imagined next world) will keep him watchful and careful. There's not much of such training around, as you'll observe!
2007-03-24 16:04:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Loved. A beloved king has little to worry about because his grasp on the throne is strong. A feared king has everything to worry about because his grasp on the throne is tenuous. The best examples I can think of immediately are Charles II of England, "The Merry Monarch" who was beloved by the people of England after years of stiff, Puritan rule under Cromwell; and Henry Tudor (Henry VII) or England who was viewed by many as a usurper and worried constantly about losing the throne of England.
2007-03-24 16:01:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Come on in, the water's lovely 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Loved. People dont like to live in fear and will eventually revolt. To be a great King you have to be strong yet fair. Loved by your people, but not weak to potential enemies.
2007-03-24 16:03:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rogue Vix 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That answer might depended upon in spite of if a prince became an absolute monarch, consisting of those Niccolo Machiavelli became initially advising in "Il Principe" (1532), or a constitutional monarch who reigns quite than regulations. on account that Machiavelli became inspiring the Medici relatives, "worry" became probably the main reasonable tactic. certainly else, Machiavelli cautioned that a ruler ought to do each little thing he/she ought to to realize stability on account that a virtuous and stable state became the excellent ethical stable. apparently sufficient, Machiavelli's entire citation in this subject be counted pronounced that a prince ought to attempt to realize the two worry and love: "it is superb to be feared and enjoyed; in spite of if, if one can't be the two, it is extra suitable to be feared than enjoyed." Constitutional monarchs, beginning with Queen Victoria, have been able to motivate admiration and loyalty, even in spite of the undeniable fact that they needless to say reign quite than rule. a as much as date constitutional monarch who reverted lower back to the quicker dictatorial kind purely would not be tolerated.
2016-12-15 08:13:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by hume 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well you kinda need both, because if they fear u they dont like u, so wats the point and if they love you theyll love u for a while but will grow tired of you, so both. both may end up bad
2007-03-24 19:03:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Loved by his people and feared by his enemies.
2007-03-24 16:13:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kristerz 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Feared, this way the army would not plot his demise and try to overrun the ruler as many did to weak rulers, esp during the Carolingian Dynasty.
2007-03-24 15:56:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sue S 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
both because that way he doesn't get into as many wars wont get overthrown and you got to make sure that your people will lesson because the can always start a revolt all it takes is someone with courage or a thirst for vengeance against you or someone in your court
2007-03-24 16:20:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hannibal Barco of Carthage 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Loved, the more the people love there leader the stronger the kingdome, in this case, will be.
2007-03-24 16:22:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Clark kent 2
·
0⤊
0⤋