I have a question for Democrats and Liberals about your misguided perceptions.?

Question

Ok let's start with the notion that the war in Iraq is illegal because noone attacked us. Think of every war we have ever been in and tell me who attacked us in them? Right noone except WWII and the Japanese attacked us and we went after the Germans. Which party took us into everyone of those wars that we were not attacked? Right again Democrats. Now you say Bush is reponsible for the death of over 3000 U.S. troops. Did you know that in the different battles Clinton took us into took the lives of 4,302 soldiers i his first term alone? You say Bush lied about WMD's and other reasons for going to war yet Hillary Clinton and John Kerry as well as other Democrats in both houses of congress claim at the time they looked carefully at the evidence and did their own investigations and came to the same results, not to mention the U.N. you love so much and Most other countries claimed the same thing. Democrats claim Bush is the stupidest man n Earth so how does he fool so many SMART Democrats?

Now I want to know where Democrats get the idea that Bush has committed war crimes and other crimes? Are you really serious? Name 1 crime of any kind that he committed and the evidence that one it is a crime and two that he did committ that crime. I'll address a few right now. Illegal wiretapping is a Democrat lie one of the men that wrote the FISA court laws says that the way the law was written gives Bush the right to do what he was doing with no warrant, so he would have had to been doing something other than what he said he was doing for it to be illegal. Vlaerie Plame was never a covert agent during her entire career and one of the poeple that wrote the laws concerning covert agents in the CIA says Valerie's position and title did not qualify as a covert agent. What is your problem with Alberto Gonzalez? yes it would have been nice to have had the truth, but it doesnt matter those positions are political and those people can be removed for any reason or no reason like it or not.

As far as international law goes The U.S. has never fully accepted it and is under no obligation to follow it.

As far as the U.N. goes and what they wanted, who really cares it is a failed organization that has never been able to accomplish what it was set up to do.

As far as the U.N. and many of the countries that chose not to join in with us and those that did join us you froget get that they were being bribed by Saddam in the oil for food scandal. Of course they didn't want to go to war they were amking money off of his defiance. Among the reasons given for going to war with Iraq was the numerous resolutions that Saddam continuously refused to follow that alone gave us the authority and in many people's mind the obligation to use force.

I don't care what you think of my sentence structure nice way to avoid the question, I am not an english major and am not going for sentence structure I am going for the amount I have to say and the limited amount of space to say it.

Actually I do know how many troops were lost under Reagan and I have much more respect for him than I ever have or will for Bush, but the fact remains he is getting the short end of the stick for trying to do something good, no matter how bad it has turned out. I agree there is a mess over there and that there need to be a solution, but making false accusations against the president or deciding to surrender and retreat is not going to make the situation any better or help this country in any way, it just makes you feel good.

I only brought up military losses in Clinton's presidency to point out the fact that he never took us into war and lost more during 1 term than Bush has in an actual war in 1.5 terms, so I think that says a lot.

Let's not forget if Clinton wasn't too afraid and involved with Monica he would have taken care of Saddam instead of launching meaningless missles at him and He would have taken care of Bin Laden instead of making sure he knew everytime we were close

Answer 1

dude...sentence structure is not your friend.

also not your friend is fact checking and research

Answer 2

You were attacked by Japan on your base of the independent country of Hawaii and Japan declared war on the US. The US was making tons of money selling arms to the allies when Germany declared war on the US which is tantamount to being attacked.

He lied about WMD in Iraq and pulled a lot of people into his illegal war. It is an illegal war by all involved as it was not sanctioned by the UN. It is even a bigger lie to trick much of the population of the states to believing they were fighting against terror in reply to 9/11. I know he never made this claim, nevertheless, this is what he led his people to think.

He has cruelly disrespected all the people in 9/11 who died and their loved ones.

Korea, North Viet Nam, Grenada, Panama, Nicaragua, Angola, Guatemala, Chili, etc. These are all places that the US physically attacked or covertly (terrorist) attacked.

Answer 3

The info given to the Dem's was the same info given to Clinton before he launched 64 missiles into a milk factory. Although this was justified by the media, today the only thing the media can do is to convince you that we are the bad people in the world. We still have troops in the Balkans under the disguise of the UN. Tell 15 dead sailors and there families that Clinton was succesful.

Answer 4

The respondents to your "Question"-- more than one question posed... All seem to have ignored a whole lot of historical facts. Reagan DID sell WMD technology to Saddam back in the 1980's. Nothing made up about that fact. Sh*t, even Hillary knew this! To date, we've only lost 2.395 men per day in Iraq. When you compare that to Patton's loss of 1,300 men every three weeks throughout 1944 when he drove the U.S. 3d Army across France -- against a uniformed, easily recognizable enemy well... Sh*t. Here we go again. Facts Vs perverse fantasy. You should ask me where Billy boy had me and what he had me doing just prior to Ken Starr releasing his "findings." The Bay of Pigs fiasco would have been peanuts had theose findings gone the other direction. Bay of Pigs... 2510 men died over a 4 day period beause while Kennedy (a Democrat) and the boys all got cold feet after Gary Powers was shot down and paraded around for all of the world to see, he cancelled the support for the operation, but not the operation itself. Wonder why? Witnesses? Dang, I hate history. Don't you? So many facts to remember and numbers too... Guess you'd have to be a republican to try and actually keep up.

Answer 5

You really put a bow on a turd and called it First Prize

Hitler Declared war on us......Try readin some History
Are you saying we were wrong to fight the Axis? Now you sound like a real Bush. Senator Bush was about as Pro Nazi as anyone holding an office in this country.

Where did you get the figure 4,302 KIA.....is there a source or did you just make it up?

Answer 6

The Democrats fought to keep us out of Europe's wars but once attacked both Democrats and Republicans clamored for war. Then again, we were attacked by Japan, did we go after the country of Chad? No we went after Japan. Germany declared war on us because we supported our friends the British. If someone officially declares war on us we go to war.

The wars we fought under Clinton were UN actions and we were invited to help out by countries under attack or their neighbors. Even George H.W. Bush didn't attack Iraq until asked for help by Kuwait. Bush lied about WMD and Congress believed him. He hadn't been in office very long. Most people believe that the Congress and the President should be honest with one another so when the Administration presented their lies (which they did well) it was believed. Now they regret believing those lies. I have never heard Bush called the stupidest man on earth just the worst president the U.S. has ever had. Experts agree that he is. Basically he is corrupt, a liar, and incompetent.

But you and your people believe the following from people much like yourselves:

Hermann Goering, second in command of the Third Reich and key founder of the Nazi party, said; “Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger”.

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic, and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the state to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
__Josef Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda

Answer 7

Hey liberal commies, this is all true! In yer face!

In WWII we lost more men in a mere hours than we have in Iraq.

The CIA girl was only a clerk and no she did not have access to anything, except the press. In essence, she was and still is a liberal fanatic.

To the awesome person who posted this question, I'm with you.

Answer 8

Bush is a pawn for our big oil companies. Get on the Internet. Do some research. Go to http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change+recut. Learn the truth about 9/11.

Answer 9

hahahaha, yes democrats are retarted fools....one thing that i laugh at is something i heard some one say..democrats always say america is a democracy, but the fact that the people hold public office, not take a vote from the masses of amercia, makes america a REPUBLIC.....

Answer 10

Eisenhower started our involvement in Viet Nam. ARe you telling me he is Democrat.
Roosevelt had to get the Republican congress into WWII kicking and screaming all the way to the vote.
And, did you know that over 20,000 soldiers died during the REagan administration alone? I didn't think so.
That far out paces Clinton by 5 to 1.
Hillary and John Kerry are hawks. Only fools would believe otherwise. They are both corporate whores, just like the Bush adminstration.
Most other countries did not say the same thing about Iraq. Quite the contrary, they completely disbelieved the white house from the very start and they actually questioned Bush's intelligence. That's why most of our allies didn't get involved in it. Tony Blair did because of his connections to British Petroleum. The UN also didn't buy Bush's pro-war with Iraq stance. You need to go back and re-read history buddy, because you totally forgot about Blix and his protest that the Bush administration was to ready to drop bombs. They told him to leave Iraq because even though he wasn't finished investigating, they were going to start bombing Iraq anyway. Geesuz, at least get your history right.

Valerie Plame was covert at the time of her outing:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11179719/site/newsweek/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6460227.stm
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/16/cia.leak/index.html

What crimes did Bush commit? Let's start with the lies about WMDs. "To put it bluntly, if Bush has taken Congress and the nation into war based on bogus information, he is cooked. Manipulation or deliberate misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven, could be "a high crime" under the Constitution's impeachment clause. It would also be a violation of federal criminal law, including the broad federal anti-conspiracy statute, which renders it a felony "to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose."

From a man who knows law and can set YOU straight about what happened during the build up of the war:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/06/findlaw.analysis.dean.wmd/

Answer 11

What makes you think facts have anything to do with liberal thinking. It's all based on touchy feely emotionalism and or political correctness (guilt) Total waste of time.