English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would think Libertarians would be against it since it seems basicly like entering private property, intrusion.

2007-03-24 15:43:39 · 5 answers · asked by ST 4 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

in maximum situations, weaker immigration rules are in place because of fact somebody (or a set of someones) desperate we would desire to constantly help the fewer fortunate. Many liberals do no longer care in spite of if the undesirable are our very own electorate or no longer. that's a typical noble reason, yet that the Aristocracy is funded via each physique else. So, it comes right down to tax payers forking over extra money to assist human beings the government has desperate to the two enable in or, as quickly as in, stay. i might say it extremely isn't very Libertarian. A Libertarian is particularly prepared with regard to the rights of * electorate *. unlawful immigrants are not on that radar.

2016-10-20 09:46:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm against it. Is a complete violation of a country and its laws. I don't support amnesty for all illegals, I think a 1,000 mile wall should be built on the border reinforced by troops guarding it. A guest worker program sounds viable to me but we have to get rid of illegal immigrants who haven't been working or have committed a crime. Let's make Mexico pay for the medical bills of illegals who go to hospitals instead of our government having to pay for it. We have to reduce legal immigration from all over the world and make more stringent laws. This is what I think of illegal immigration as a Libertarian.

2007-03-25 06:58:28 · answer #2 · answered by cynical 6 · 1 0

I don't like it, but I see why it happens. The US employers want these immigrants to work so they pay less. We need to accept that the US Companies are interested only in themselves, not the country. When it is beneficial they go overseas, they hire cheap illegal help for profit. And they don't want the minimum wage increased to where a worker can live.

2007-03-24 15:50:56 · answer #3 · answered by Nort 6 · 0 0

Eliminate the incentives for low-lifes to want to cross your borders, and you can remove all restrictions on human movement. In other words, be *very* harsh with justly convicted criminals, remove all restrictions on honest private enterprise, and restore charity work to churches and other philanthropists. Anyone who still wants to come in will probably be someone worth having no matter where they came from. -yk

2007-03-24 15:50:11 · answer #4 · answered by Yaakov 6 · 0 0

Round them up....Ship them out.......TODAY!!....

2007-03-24 15:50:25 · answer #5 · answered by bodie 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers