If they make the decision why do we need a Secretary of Defense or a Commander-in-Chief?
2007-03-24 15:26:03 · 9 answers · asked by NuncProTunc 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He is the decider only when the ideas work in his favor. When the ideas suck, then it is someone else's fault. typical. How best to blame someone else instead of himself.
This was the same twit how said he listened to the Generals in the field. They said " No surge" what did he do- surge.
If this fails, he won't take responsibility. It will become Secretary Gate's fault. Watch and see.
2007-03-24 15:28:36 · answer #1 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
He quit deciding things in November when Democrats won control of Congress and Rove disappeared to do more important things than hang around with a lame duck loser of a president.
It was hilarious when the ‘Great Decider’ said he was going to take a vacation to Crawford so he could think about thinking about what to decide about the Baker report. Apparently he decided to continue his losing streak - at the expense of other people’s lives.
2007-03-24 22:36:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Civilians make the ultimate decisions. That's the way the founding Fathers set it up.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-03-24 22:33:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wish we as Americans held these politicians to a higher standard.
NONE OF THEM HAVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLES INTEREST AT HEART. THEY TURN ALL OF OUR PROBLEMS THAT CAN BE SOLVED WITH GOVERNMENT INTO A POLITICAL GAME. PERIOD.
I'll never trust this government again. plain and simple. they are ALL bought and paid for by the same money men in New York. and then paraded in front of us, AS IF WE HAVE A CHOICE.
2007-03-24 22:40:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because as all good leaders do, he delegates authority effectively to those who are trained to make those decisions.
2007-03-24 22:32:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He only distributes blame when it suits him. I say, either take responsibility if you're going to call yourself the "decider" or be a team player and work together for a common good.
2007-03-24 22:29:55 · answer #6 · answered by Groovy 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I dont recall the general making the call.
He could have said this is what we need for this operation and Bush authorized it.
2007-03-24 22:29:01 · answer #7 · answered by Labtec600 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The decider-in-chief let the lesser deciders decide this time. Wasn't that generous of him?
2007-03-24 22:30:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He is an expert at deflecting blame.
2007-03-24 23:00:58 · answer #9 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋