English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We now have a president who routinely ignores the will of the people and of Congress. He's like a rogue elephant. How can we prevent this from happening again?

2007-03-24 13:25:55 · 17 answers · asked by Cochise 1 in Politics & Government Government

17 answers

Gouverneur Morris was a framer of the constitution. He prepared the final draft of the Constitution. As a member of the U.S. Constitutional Convention of 1787 Morris played an active role, defending a strong centralized government and a powerful executive. He remained a champion of aristocracy who distrusted democratic rule.

Are you talking about his vision?

2007-03-24 13:36:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, This is undoubtedly the case.
Good government is a delicate operation of checks and balances, and this system is out of kilter.
The President of the United states is duty bound to represent
the interests of all the people of the U.S.A..
This is clearly no longer the case, and something has to be done.

It is clearly time to have a look at a complete overhaul of
the election system.

If Presidents can set of on a course of partisan showboating
for years on end with utter impunity, things are really bad.
I have a few suggestions to make.

- Shorter terms in Congress and Senate
this will improve accountability and keep 'm eager

- Important policy decisions must me debated in Congress
and Senate and decisions will have to be made there.

-The Presidency is an executive branch and therefore
subordinate to Congress and Senate.

-The Administration should take care of all Americans
wishes so whoever is in power should be obliged
to allocate important government positions to
obviously competent members of the losing party.
( You can't very well maintain all your opponents
are blundering idiots,and every post or policy
controversial, and it should create a feeling of
shared responsibility, maybe even cooperation
America needs some healing in this respect )

-Get rid of this strange delegates vote for President Lark
and state winner takes them all nonsense.
One man one vote - for president,the whole nation
(As a foreigner I never understood this bit of the system
last election only 5/6 states really mattered,the rest was
a foregone conclusion,why did people on the losing side
even bothered to vote?, it is thrown in the bin straight-
afterwards and you'll be ignored for four years.)

No hope in hell of this happening,but it's better than
what is going on now.

2007-04-01 09:46:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, the President has more power now than the framers of the Constitution ever dreamed of. We must join together during the 2008 elections, making it clear to the government "No More, we will take no more of it." Let the people know they can take back this country. Obama is a good way to start. Check out his websites as listed below.

2007-04-01 04:31:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I believe it has. Bush has repeatedly said on certain issues "I will veto" before the bill ever makes it to him. Bush thinks his is a king and that his rule is absolute and that his power is absolute. If nothing else, Bush will lie to America to get what he wants - not what the American people want. If I am not mistaken the Constitution distinctly says - "Of the people, by the people, FOR the people.
True democracy was taken from the voters with the electoral college. Votes should be 'by the people, for the people. If your vote is not counted past a state level, in essence it dows not count at all.
Bush has taken a democracy and turned it into a tyranny run by 'king george'.

2007-03-28 23:26:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh! I find that rogue elephant metaphor absolutely delightful. Yes, the man in the White House has an altogether different view of what it means to be President than did the framers of the US government. They conceived of government as an enemy to be curtailed by law to the will of the people. He seems to have a somewhat royal concept. I've heard the term imperial presidency.

2007-03-24 14:51:45 · answer #5 · answered by teetzijo 3 · 0 0

The Founding Fathers framed the Constitution the way they did to account for just such a scenario that is happening now. It is called checks and balances. Executive, Legislative and Judicial all have equal power. King George is now finding out that he is not lord and master of all he surveys. Thank goodness people wised up and muzzled him in the last election.

2007-03-24 14:07:40 · answer #6 · answered by Slimsmom 6 · 0 0

The people have more power than they realize. We just have to be organized and not give up. There are many, many of us who cannot believe the audacity of this president. Impeachbush.org, and theworldcantwait.org are only two good ones.
It won't be long now until we get what we want-Bush out of office. I just cannot believe the damage he and his cronies have done to not only the country but to way too much of this world.
I had a dream not long ago where W. was telling his Daddy Bush that he didn't want to wear the hat that was on fire. His dad told him he had to anyway.
This is, I believe, reality.

2007-03-24 13:36:37 · answer #7 · answered by Cindy P 4 · 0 0

Three separate but equal branches is what the framers' envisioned. Bush is not overstepping his authority, although I don't like what he does, he is the President elected by the electoral college. Young people need to vote, and vote Democrat!!! GO HILLARY!

2007-03-24 13:34:15 · answer #8 · answered by John Luke 5 · 0 0

this is putting it mildly. The Framers would turn over of their graves in the event that they knew the crap our government is doing now. show A: taxes are to be proportionate to representation. greater taxes now than ever before. show B: tests and Balances: by way of fact while can the President declare conflict? show C: government Spending : tutor me one line contained in the form that states the government has the ability to bailout substantial companies with tax payers money. show D: party Politics: Madison wrote "Ambition would counter ambition." All I see is two selections with somewhat any diverse consequences show E: Patriot Act: Are you freaking kidding me? This us of a became based on the suited of LIBERTY. Washington himself would die if he heard the president ought to bypass the invoice of rights at will. i ought to save going, yet you get the factor.

2016-10-01 10:46:56 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yea, definietely. Bush had torn up the constitution he promised to upheld. This guy's gotta go. He's so stubburn. The people wants change and he does not listen to the voters except his crony cabinet members who knows nothing. Someone's gotta take this guy out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-04-01 07:35:33 · answer #10 · answered by Robert T 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers