I saw this on the science channel. They've had them for years. Runs off straight oxygen and leaves no pollution whatsoever. They're also talking about making it so it generates it's own pressurized air at the same time, so you'll never have to fill it up.
Shouldn't we have invested in this years ago instead? Instead of bickering about Global Warming and wasting time?
2007-03-24 13:02:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Merk- This is just what they said on the show. They haven't got it to the point where it creates it's own pressurized air just yet, but they're working on it. Other than that though, they have it and had it and it looks like it works pretty darn good from what I saw..
2007-03-24 13:16:05 · update #1
BTW- And it's not a perpetual motion machine, it's an engine that runs off "pressurized air" while creating it's own "pressurized air" at the same time..
2007-03-24 13:17:51 · update #2
I think that the Hulkster should run wild on the gas engine.
2007-03-26 09:49:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, this technology is absolutely worthy of investment for a couple of good reasons. 1. It is clean. The engine itself produces no polution. 2. Any technology that will help our country (the world?) reduce it's dependence on oil is a good thing. The only way we can stop worrying about the middle east is to stop needing the one thing they have that we need.
2007-03-24 21:05:41 · answer #2 · answered by Don 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
something smells fishy. What your talking about would be a perpetual motion machine (of sorts), in that it would create energy equal to or greater than what it requires to run, therefore becoming self sustaining. According to the 2nd law of thermodynamics this isn't possible. 'Its the law of physics Jim." If someone had truly created this, then it would be like discovering cold fusion or something and would revolutionize the world. I would say, check it out more carefully. Don't think its exactly what it seems.
2007-03-24 20:11:54 · answer #3 · answered by Merk 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes...anything to stop us from being dependent on Middle East Oil
2007-03-24 20:06:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think US should stop using big vehicles and SUVs. Simple cars and small ones can get you from one place to an other. See europe ... SMART car???
2007-03-24 20:07:45 · answer #5 · answered by beont 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think us should not invest on this side, U.S should invest on for economic side & also help & invest the needy country than they will praise for U.S and also the image of U.S will be more boosted in the world eyes.
2007-03-24 20:19:18 · answer #6 · answered by Muhammad Saeed k 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely we should.
As soon as we heard about it, my hubby tried to find out how soon we can get them in the U.S.
2007-03-24 20:07:35 · answer #7 · answered by Praise Singer 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say go for it!!!!!
2007-03-24 20:05:05 · answer #8 · answered by Black Dragon 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋