Check these recorded quotes:
http://www.bushoniraq.com/index.html
and then tell me you're still in denial.
2007-03-24 12:28:02 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yea he did, absolutely. An the Most Disturbing question is Why are so many Americans buying into this lie.
2007-03-30 01:55:04 · answer #1 · answered by Robert T 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Fact: If "Bush lies" rhetoric had any validity, the democrats would have started impeachment proceedings long ago.
For example, the first "lie" on the link you provided:
Direct quote:
"The regime has the scientists and facilities to build nuclear weapons, and is seeking the materials needed to do so."
Lberal rhetoric: This is a lie.
Fact: The last UN resolution that Saddam rejected was number 1284 - prior to the inspection team being kicked out in 1999, the UN inspectors had managed to destroy "48 long range missiles, 30 chemical warheads, 40,000 chemical munitions and 690 tons of chemical agents. They also discovered a nuclear program far in advance of anything they had previously thought."
Hindsight is always 20/20, but, unfortunately, it's not available at the time the tough decisions are made. Bush based his aforementioned statement on reports straight from the (on the ground and in Iraq) UN inspectors' reports - a pretty good source at the time, I would think.
No, I am not in denial. Don't you ever wonder why none of these "lies" was disputed or exposed at the time they were aledged to have been told? With the benefit of hindsight some time later - it is easy to point out the misinformation - and even easier to lable them lies. Don't you think if any of the democrats had any more reliable information or knew any more than the president - they would have recognized the lies immediately - and not years later?
2007-03-24 19:57:15 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How can I be in denial about things I seen first hand? If I didn't see WMD's at work then what the hell was I looking at?
Babies with blisters the size of softballs on their heads, backs twsted like pretzels from the convulsions, mothers with their toungues forced out of their mouths because the body muscle spasming. That sure as hell isnt a conventional bomb.
2007-03-24 19:32:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No I don't think he lied, I know that is the only thing he's good at! He rode his daddy's coat tails into office and hasn't done
anything but cause problems! I'm surprised there hasn't been another civil war to remove him from office!
2007-03-24 19:58:09 · answer #4 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lets see;
He lied about College
Lied about his military service
Lied about not rigging the election
Lied as a Governor
Lied about Iraq
and kept silent about Skull and Bones ,,, ...hhhmmm
Some people think the Easter BUNNY lays EGGS.
2007-03-24 20:37:28 · answer #5 · answered by pompanopete0 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We know Bush's record.
2007-03-24 20:05:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes. he also created Katrina, the global warming, the oil crisis, the Sudan disaster, fixing the elections. the man is so powerful. can Hilary or Osama or Boxer do that?
have you ever lied?
2007-03-30 23:20:46 · answer #7 · answered by Chula Lula 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dude...I'm a Dem/Lib...but this is old news and an old link...find new stuff..here..start reading this, and point out the crap as I do..
http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html
2007-03-24 19:32:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
if you think he didn't lie then you are living in a fantasy world get real i am not a bush head fan
2007-03-24 19:30:42 · answer #9 · answered by lesleyanne1965@verizon.net 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
We know...Bush is the enemy. There was no such thing as war and terrorism before Bush was President.
2007-03-24 19:31:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋