2007-03-24 12:27:07 · 9 answers · asked by tim b 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
President Reagan would have gone in stronger in the first place. He had great Diplomacy skills also, he may have gotten more support.
2007-03-24 12:34:42 · answer #1 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I actually think Mr. Reagan's policy considered Iraq "friendly." The only thing his administration cared about was communism, and Saddam Hussein was an anticommunist dictator. I haven't researched the amount of support or aid given to him and other "friendly" regimes, but I imagine it was in the form of weapons. You could probably look up Ronald Reagan's opinion somewhere. I think he passed after the invasion but I could be wrong.
2007-03-24 12:36:26 · answer #2 · answered by Brandon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reagon would advise Bush to make a parking lot for Kuwait out of Iraq then go into Iran and do the same thing.
2007-03-28 12:41:20 · answer #3 · answered by stormchasers2006 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reagan was much more intelligent & diplomatic. He wouldn't have told all those lies to justify starting an immoral war for greed or vengance.
http://www.bushoniraq.com/index.html
2007-03-24 12:45:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe "Saint Ronnie" would have said...
Dubya...ya messed up again...big time...
Oh well...have some jelly beans.
2007-03-24 12:37:12 · answer #5 · answered by BUSH IS A CLOWN 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
more than likely with the cowboy mentality it would be let's go ahead and deploy the nukes
2007-03-24 14:16:34 · answer #6 · answered by billc4u 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do it the right way or not at all.
2007-03-24 13:25:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Mr. Bush, tear down that war."
2007-04-01 10:16:54 · answer #8 · answered by jackbutler5555 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is a good question...we can only wonder or maybe ask his son...
2007-03-24 12:31:22 · answer #9 · answered by BEN JEE 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋